Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
adversarial politicisation
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "adversarial politicisation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing political strategies or actions that create conflict or opposition. Example: "The adversarial politicisation of the issue has led to increased division among the parties involved."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
But his adversarial politicisation of science is not the solution.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
And adversarial.
News & Media
Ours is an adversarial system.
News & Media
This politicisation showed in April.
News & Media
"We have an adversarial system.
News & Media
Isn't that how politicisation happens sometimes?
News & Media
"It was not adversarial.
News & Media
It was more adversarial.
News & Media
Not an adversarial process.
News & Media
Some participants found such politicisation unwelcome.
News & Media
"Politicisation is now getting to an extreme".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "adversarial politicisation", ensure that the context clearly demonstrates a situation where political actions are creating conflict or opposition. Clarity is crucial, as the phrase is relatively uncommon.
Common error
Avoid using "adversarial politicisation" in situations where political activity is simply present but not inherently conflict-driven. Reserve it for scenarios marked by clear antagonism.
Source & Trust
96%
Authority and reliability
4.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "adversarial politicisation" functions as a noun phrase, describing a process where political actions or strategies are used in an opposing or conflicting manner. Ludwig provides examples where this involves science, media, and general political discourse.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "adversarial politicisation" is a noun phrase that describes the process of using political strategies to create conflict or opposition. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, although its usage is rare, primarily appearing in news and media contexts. While the phrase is valid, writers should ensure that its use is appropriate for situations where a clear adversarial dynamic is present. Alternatives like "conflict-based politicization" or "antagonistic politicization" may offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
conflict-based politicization
Replaces "adversarial" with "conflict-based", emphasizing the conflict aspect of the politicization process. The degree of semantic variation with the QUERY is relatively low.
antagonistic politicization
Substitutes "adversarial" with "antagonistic", highlighting the hostile nature of the politicization. This change has minimal semantic difference.
combative politicization
Uses "combative" instead of "adversarial", focusing on the aggressive nature of the political actions. This results in low semantic change.
contentious politicization
Replaces "adversarial" with "contentious", underscoring the disputed nature of the politicization. It introduces a slight semantic variation.
divisive politicization
Substitutes "adversarial" with "divisive", highlighting the polarizing effect of the politicization. The semantic change is small.
polarizing politicization
Uses "polarizing" instead of "adversarial", focusing on the tendency to create opposing viewpoints. The semantic difference is low.
political antagonism
Simplifies the phrase to focus on political hostility, omitting the specific process of politicization.
politicization through conflict
Rephrases to emphasize the means of politicization (through conflict) rather than its inherent nature.
weaponization of politics
Uses metaphor to describe politicization as a form of weaponization, which conveys a more aggressive sense.
hostile political maneuvering
Shifts the focus to the actions taken within a hostile political landscape, moving away from the concept of politicization itself.
FAQs
How can "adversarial politicisation" be used in a sentence?
You can use "adversarial politicisation" to describe situations where political strategies are used to create or exacerbate conflict, such as "The "adversarial politicisation" of the healthcare debate led to increased public division".
What are some alternatives to "adversarial politicisation"?
Some alternatives include "conflict-based politicization", "antagonistic politicization", or "contentious politicization", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
What does "adversarial politicisation" imply?
"Adversarial politicisation" implies that political processes or actions are designed or used to create opposition, division, or conflict, often in a deliberate or strategic manner.
In what contexts is "adversarial politicisation" most appropriately used?
It is most appropriate in contexts discussing political strategies that intentionally create opposing sides or deepen existing divisions, such as in discussions of political campaigns, policy debates, or international relations.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
96%
Authority and reliability
4.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested