admitted with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "admitted with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a clear meaning without additional context. Example: "He was admitted with a serious condition that required immediate attention."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Bypassed, admitted with a touch of reluctance.

Independent

"Yes," he admitted with a laugh.

The New York Times

"O.K.," he admitted with a laugh.

The New York Times - Style

A fit young man is admitted with vague symptoms.

The Economist

She had been admitted with shingles.

BBC

Participants: 806 patients consecutively admitted with HF.

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Results: 14 patients were admitted with PRES.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

All patients admitted with septic shock were included.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

He was admitted with severe encephalopathy and coma.

Insights into Imaging

To describe the characteristics of patients admitted with GBS.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Patients: Two samples of 50 patients admitted with primary diagnosis of hip fracture.

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For medical contexts, use more specific and clearer alternatives such as "hospitalized with" or "treated for" to enhance precision and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "admitted with" when a more specific description of the medical context is available. For example, instead of "The patient was admitted with symptoms", specify "The patient was hospitalized with a high fever and respiratory distress".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "admitted with" functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, often used in medical contexts to indicate the reason for a patient's admission to a hospital. However, Ludwig AI suggests it might not be grammatically ideal.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "admitted with" is frequently used, particularly in scientific and news contexts, to describe the reason for a patient's hospitalization. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not correct in standard written English. While the phrase is widely used, it may be better to use more precise alternatives like "hospitalized with", "treated for", or "diagnosed with" to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity. Ludwig's analysis highlights the phrase's common usage but also suggests that writers should consider more specific phrasing for better grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

entered the hospital with

Offers a more detailed phrasing of the admission process, specifying the location.

hospitalized with

Replaces 'admitted' with a more specific term related to medical care in a hospital setting.

treated for

Focuses on the medical intervention received for a specific condition, rather than the admission process.

diagnosed with

Emphasizes the identification of a medical condition, instead of the act of being admitted.

presented with

Highlights the initial symptoms or conditions upon arrival at a medical facility.

suffering from

Describes the patient's experience and condition before or during the admission.

lodged with

Used in non-medical contexts to indicate temporary accommodation or affiliation.

booked with

Implies a scheduled arrangement, often in hospitality or travel contexts.

enrolled with

Suggests registration or participation in a program, rather than a medical admission.

associated with

Denotes a connection or relationship, broadly applicable beyond medical admissions.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "admitted with" in a medical context?

Consider using more precise phrases like "hospitalized with", "treated for", or "diagnosed with" depending on the specific information you want to convey.

Is "admitted with" grammatically correct?

While commonly used, "admitted with" can be vague and may not be considered grammatically ideal. Using a more specific phrase often improves clarity.

How can I use "admitted with" in a sentence?

While it appears in many sentences in scientific and news contexts, aim for clarity by using alternative phrases, such as: "The patient was hospitalized with pneumonia" instead of "The patient was "admitted with" pneumonia.

What's the difference between "admitted with" and "diagnosed with"?

"Admitted with" refers to the initial presentation and reason for hospital admission, while "diagnosed with" refers to the confirmed medical condition after examination and testing.