adequately supported

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "adequately supported" is correct and can be used in written English.
It means that something has enough evidence or proof to back it up and is deemed satisfactory. Example: The researcher's findings were adequately supported by various studies and experiments conducted in the field.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These findings are adequately supported by the evidence.

Cornell University

The experimental observations were adequately supported by theoretical calculations.

Dyes and Pigments

This is an indication that the board is not adequately supported by the riser.

The New York Times

On the contrary, analysis and test are not adequately supported yet.

Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science

We are determined to make sure that our decision is adequately supported in law by the evidence presented on Thursday".

The New York Times

He adds that, through surgery and managing pain with morphine, patients should be adequately supported in the meantime.

The Guardian

Working in well-managed groups that are adequately supported, general internal medicine practitioners can have fulfilling careers.

The New York Times

Overall, 76% said they felt adequately supported during the patient's last two days of life, almost a quarter did not.

The Guardian

But it found that the accusation that Berlusconi knew El-Mahroug was underage was "not adequately supported by evidence".

The Guardian

Earlier efforts to provide guidelines for universal design have not adequately supported industry requisites.

Design Studies

They argued that the record of the investigation adequately supported the settlement, regardless of what the company claimed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "adequately supported" in academic writing, ensure that you explicitly cite the sources or data that provide the support. This strengthens your argument and enhances credibility.

Common error

Avoid claiming something is "adequately supported" when the evidence is weak or preliminary. Use qualifiers like "partially supported" or "tentatively supported" if the evidence is not conclusive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adequately supported" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state of something being sufficiently backed by evidence or justification. Ludwig shows that this phrase is commonly used to assess the validity of claims, arguments, or systems.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

30%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "adequately supported" is a versatile expression used to indicate that something is sufficiently backed by evidence or justification. As confirmed by Ludwig, its grammatical status is correct, and it enjoys very common usage across various contexts, particularly in science, news media, and academic writing. When employing this phrase, it's essential to ensure that the supporting evidence is explicitly cited and to avoid overstating the strength of the support. Alternatives like "sufficiently substantiated" or "well-founded" can be considered for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficiently substantiated

Focuses on the provision of enough evidence or proof to validate a claim or argument. It emphasizes the establishment of a firm basis through verifiable information.

well-founded

Indicates that something is based on solid reasons or evidence, highlighting the existence of a rational and justifiable basis.

amply justified

Emphasizes that there is more than enough reason or evidence to defend or excuse something, underlining the abundance of supporting factors.

properly backed

Highlights the correct or appropriate form of support, suggesting that the backing is suitable and meets the required standards.

credibly upheld

Suggests that something is maintained or defended in a believable and convincing manner, emphasizing the reliability of the support.

soundly reasoned

Indicates that something is based on a well-structured and logical argument, highlighting the intellectual rigor behind the support.

validly defended

Implies that something is protected or justified in a legally or officially acceptable manner, emphasizing the legitimacy of the support.

firmly established

Focuses on the secure and stable nature of the support, suggesting that it is robust and unlikely to be easily overturned.

convincingly proven

Highlights the persuasive nature of the evidence, indicating that it is compelling enough to establish something as true or valid.

satisfactorily validated

Indicates that something has been confirmed or proven to be correct or effective to a sufficient degree, emphasizing the adequacy of the verification process.

FAQs

How can I use "adequately supported" in a sentence?

You can use "adequately supported" to describe claims, arguments, or decisions that have sufficient evidence or justification. For example: "The researcher's hypothesis was "adequately supported" by the experimental data."

What are some alternatives to "adequately supported"?

Alternatives include "sufficiently substantiated", "well-founded", or "amply justified". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

What does it mean for a claim to be "adequately supported"?

It means that the claim has enough evidence or reasoning to be considered valid or credible. The level of support needed can vary depending on the context, with academic or legal settings often requiring more rigorous support than informal discussions.

Is there a difference between "adequately supported" and "fully supported"?

Yes, "adequately supported" implies that there is sufficient support, while "fully supported" suggests that there is complete or comprehensive support. "Fully supported" is a stronger statement and requires more robust evidence. Depending on the context, alternatives phrases such as "amply justified" or "credibly upheld" could be more adequate.