adequately funded

USAGE SUMMARY

'adequately funded' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to refer to something that has been given enough money or resources to do what it needs to do. For example, "The school was given an adequate level of funding to ensure the students had all the supplies they needed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The regulator has argued that it is not adequately funded.

The Guardian

I want my school to be adequately funded.

The New York Times

"If new costs to councils are not adequately funded then services will suffer.

The Guardian

Only robust, accessible and adequately funded services will be able to maintain this level of care.

The Guardian

An adequately funded adult social care system is essential to a sustainable NHS.

The Guardian

"They have never been adequately funded, even through the boon years of the 90's".

The New York Times

The Warburg Institute must now be adequately funded by the university".

The New Yorker

The big question everyone is asking is whether the Care Act will be adequately funded.

The Guardian

As recently as 2000, most corporate plans were adequately funded, or at least appeared to be.

The New York Times - Magazine

To prove them wrong, Mr. de Blasio needs to keep the commission adequately funded.

The New York Times

However, the bank's chief executive insisted that the bank was adequately funded.

The Telegraph

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When advocating for financial support, use "adequately funded" to convey the need for a sustainable and effective level of investment. It implies more than just basic survival, but a level that allows for growth and success.

Common error

Don't just state something should be "adequately funded" without specifying what that entails. Provide specific figures, goals, or benchmarks to illustrate what adequate funding looks like in practice.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adequately funded" primarily functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, indicating that the noun (e.g., a program, organization, or project) receives sufficient financial resources. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

25%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Science

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "adequately funded" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to describe something that has received sufficient financial resources. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms its proper usage across varied contexts, notably in news, business, and academic domains. It indicates that resources are sufficient for effective operation and goal achievement. Related phrases include "sufficiently financed" and "properly resourced". When using "adequately funded", be specific about what constitutes adequate funding and avoid vague quantifications. High-authority sources like The Guardian and The New York Times commonly employ this phrase, solidifying its credibility and utility in professional discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Sufficiently financed

Replaces "adequately" with "sufficiently", emphasizing the adequacy of financial resources.

Appropriately funded

Similar to "adequately funded", but emphasizes the appropriateness of the funding level.

Properly resourced

Shifts the focus from funding to resources, highlighting the availability of necessary materials and support.

Well-funded

A more concise and common alternative, emphasizing positive financial status.

Financially secure

Focuses on the financial stability resulting from adequate funding.

Fully financed

Suggests that all financial needs are completely met.

Substantially supported

Highlights the level of support received, implying a significant amount of funding.

Amply provided for

Emphasizes generous provision of resources, including funding.

Viably funded

Highlights the capability of the funding to ensure viability.

Soundly financed

Suggests a solid and reliable financial foundation.

FAQs

How to use "adequately funded" in a sentence?

You can use "adequately funded" to describe programs, organizations, or projects that receive sufficient financial resources. For example: "The research project was "adequately funded" to complete all phases of the study."

What can I say instead of "adequately funded"?

You can use alternatives like "sufficiently financed", "properly resourced", or "well-funded" depending on the context.

What's the difference between "adequately funded" and "fully funded"?

"Adequately funded" implies that something has enough resources to function effectively, whereas "fully funded" suggests that all financial needs are completely met. Fully funded may imply that extra financial resources are available.

Which is correct, "adequately funded" or "inadequately funded"?

Both "adequately funded" and its opposite, "inadequately funded", are correct, depending on whether the subject has sufficient funding or not. The correct choice depends on the actual funding situation.