adequately compensated for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "adequately compensated for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether someone has received a fair or sufficient payment or reward for their work or contributions. Example: "After reviewing the project outcomes, we believe that the team was adequately compensated for their efforts and dedication."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

51 human-written examples

She is concerned that they have been excluded from the social contract, that they are not adequately compensated for their overtime, that adequate regulations are not in place to protect live-in helpers.

Los Angeles Times

Doctors cannot be adequately compensated for what they do".

The New York Times

To be sure, people should be adequately compensated for their work.

The New York Times

Even so, the wastepickers are not yet adequately compensated for the work they do.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

They may feel they are being adequately compensated for the exposure.

The New York Times

But because farmers are not always adequately compensated for the lost chickens, they may deny that their birds are sick.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

9 human-written examples

Is there enough money anywhere to adequately compensate for it?

The New York Times

Where such changes cannot adequately compensate for the potential risk Mr. Mobley presents, then defenses need to be strengthened.

The New York Times

In truth, primary care has become two jobs, which is why the salary doesn't adequately compensate for the work required.

The New York Times

Even ethical researchers feel that companies like iDefense and TippingPoint do not adequately compensate for the time and effort needed to discover flaws in complex, relatively secure software.

The New York Times - Tech

However, does this adequately compensate for the human rights disaster of an anti-EU organisation not receiving EU funding because it was too thick and disorganised to apply on time?

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "adequately compensated for", ensure the context clearly defines what constitutes adequate compensation. Be specific about the criteria or standards used to determine sufficiency.

Common error

Avoid solely focusing on financial aspects when assessing if someone is "adequately compensated for". Consider non-monetary benefits like recognition, opportunities for growth, or improved work-life balance that might contribute to overall satisfaction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adequately compensated for" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that someone or something has received a sufficient level of payment or recompense. Ludwig AI confirms its use in contexts where fairness in compensation is being evaluated.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

11%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "adequately compensated for" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to describe whether a fair or sufficient payment or reward has been provided. Ludwig AI confirms this widespread usage across various contexts. The phrase appears most frequently in news, scientific, and academic domains, reflecting its relevance in discussions around labor, resources, and financial matters. When using this phrase, it's crucial to clearly define what "adequate" means in the given context to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrasing, like "fairly remunerated for" or "justly rewarded for", can offer nuanced expressions depending on the specific scenario.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fairly remunerated for

Replaces "compensated" with "remunerated", emphasizing monetary payment and implying fairness.

justly rewarded for

Substitutes "compensated" with "rewarded", highlighting recognition beyond just monetary payment and indicating moral correctness.

appropriately reimbursed for

Focuses on repayment of expenses or losses, changing the context from general compensation to specific reimbursement.

sufficiently repaid for

Emphasizes the act of paying back a debt or service, suggesting a return for something given.

duly recompensed for

Uses "recompensed" which is a more formal synonym of compensated, suggesting a formal or legal context.

suitably acknowledged for

Shifts the focus to recognition rather than financial compensation, implying appreciation for contributions.

properly paid for

Simple substitution of "compensated" with "paid", focusing on the act of payment.

equitably treated regarding compensation

Rephrases to highlight equal and fair treatment in terms of pay, broadening the scope from a single event to overall treatment.

adequately recognized regarding remuneration

Combines recognition with payment, emphasizing that the acknowledgement translates into proper remuneration.

well-deserved compensation for

Adds an element of deservingness to the compensation, implying that the recipient earned the payment.

FAQs

How can I use "adequately compensated for" in a sentence?

You can use "adequately compensated for" to describe a situation where someone receives fair or sufficient payment or reward for their work, services, or losses. For example, "The employees felt they were not "adequately compensated for" their overtime hours".

What are some alternatives to "adequately compensated for"?

Alternatives to "adequately compensated for" include "fairly remunerated for", "justly rewarded for", and "appropriately reimbursed for". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to use "compensated for" or "reimbursed for"?

"Compensated for" generally refers to payment for work or services, while "reimbursed for" specifically refers to repayment of expenses or losses. Use "reimbursed for" when discussing covering incurred costs, and "compensated for" in other cases.

What does it mean if someone is not "adequately compensated for" something?

If someone is not "adequately compensated for" something, it means they have not received what is considered a fair or sufficient reward, payment, or repayment for their efforts, services, or losses. This can lead to dissatisfaction and disputes.