Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
adequate quality for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "adequate quality for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the sufficiency or acceptability of the quality of something in relation to a specific purpose or requirement. Example: "The product must meet adequate quality for it to be approved for sale in the market."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
News & Media
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
30 human-written examples
But the tangible products of a hackathon (hardware, software) are rarely of adequate quality for real-world use.
Access to a sufficient quantity of water of adequate quality for human consumption is a global problem.
Science
The echoes were judged of adequate quality for measurement of structures.
Academia
Interobserver and intraobserver agreement analysis was performed.Prevalence of morphologic parameters using SDOCT.Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients had SDOCT B-scans of adequate quality for analysis.
Academia
However, in several practical applications, the images produced with the conventional reconstruction workflow for PBI SR (upmu -CT might not present an adequpmu -CTlity for further analyses.
Especially for the EMS, it only gets a very smaller portion of transmission power, which cannot guarantee adequate quality for the enhanced layer.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
30 human-written examples
This indirect-ELISA using soluble antigens from whole cell lysate of T. evansi and antibovine conjugate was proved to have adequate qualities for serodiagnosis in buffaloes.
Therefore, in this context, it is important to ensure an adequate quality of life for patients.
The spectral handoff is important in cognitive wireless networks to ensure an adequate quality of service and performance for secondary user communications.
You need adequate, quality sleep for recovery and the production of hormones associated with muscle growth, Siekaniec writes, and although studies show alcohol might help you fall asleep, it interferes with your cycles of restorative sleep throughout the night.
News & Media
Data were obtained from 21/27 (77.8%) volunteers who presented adequate quality imaging for analysis.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "adequate quality for", ensure you clearly define the specific purpose or requirement the quality needs to meet. This provides context and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "adequate quality for" without specifying the context. Saying something is of 'adequate quality' without stating what it's adequate for makes the statement vague and less impactful.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "adequate quality for" functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun, indicating that the quality of something is sufficient or acceptable for a specific purpose or requirement, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
Science
62%
Academia
24%
News & Media
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
6%
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "adequate quality for" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to describe something that meets a minimum required standard for a particular purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and frequent use across diverse fields, particularly in science, academia, and to a lesser extent, news and business. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what the quality is adequate for, avoiding vagueness. Alternatives like "sufficient quality for" or "suitable quality for" can be used depending on the desired nuance. While the expression is versatile, it leans towards formal contexts where careful quality assessment is key.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
sufficient quality for
Emphasizes that the quality meets the minimum requirements or standards.
acceptable quality for
Focuses on the quality being satisfactory or permissible for the intended use.
suitable quality for
Highlights the appropriateness of the quality for a particular purpose or situation.
good enough quality for
Indicates the quality is adequate to fulfill the basic needs or requirements, potentially implying a lower standard.
high enough quality for
Suggests the quality reaches a certain threshold necessary for a specific application.
decent quality for
Implies a moderately acceptable quality, suitable for ordinary purposes.
reasonable quality for
Stresses that the quality is fair and justifiable, considering the circumstances or cost.
serviceable quality for
Focuses on the quality being sufficient to provide a useful service or function.
passable quality for
Indicates the quality barely meets the minimum standards but is still acceptable.
satisfactory quality for
Highlights that the quality meets expectations and fulfills the requirements adequately.
FAQs
What does "adequate quality for" mean?
The phrase "adequate quality for" indicates that something meets a satisfactory or acceptable standard for a specific purpose or requirement. It implies the quality is sufficient to fulfill a particular need.
How can I use "adequate quality for" in a sentence?
You can use "adequate quality for" to describe whether something is good enough for a particular use. For example, "The data was of "adequate quality for" our modeling."
What are some alternatives to saying "adequate quality for"?
Alternatives include "sufficient quality for", "acceptable quality for" or "suitable quality for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "adequate quality for" or "good quality for"?
"Adequate quality for" suggests the minimum requirement is met, while "good quality for" implies a higher standard. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize meeting the basic requirement or exceeding it. The distinction depends on the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested