added cost for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "added cost for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing additional expenses associated with a product, service, or project. Example: "The new features will incur an added cost for the customer, which will be reflected in the final invoice."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

The added cost for work at the plant, which has been shut since February, will be about $115 million in 2002 and 2003.

The New York Times

Any added cost for reclamation could be offset by up to $10 million from recycled materials and from selling the land.

The New York Times

A committee, for example, will decide which preventative care treatments must be covered in every insurance policy an added cost for you, yes, and potentially without benefit.

Forbes

But the upfront cost of the machine was high and people had to pay an added cost for the refillable packets.

TechCrunch

The added cost for taxpayers:12 billion over the next ten years.

Huffington Post

*Total added cost for computer navigation equipment, software and maintenance contract per year.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

News editors have conflated on-demand with live – and in doing so have added costs for very little audience benefit.

The Guardian

Airlines said they were concerned that the added costs for liquid scanners would ultimately lead to higher ticket prices.

The New York Times

There are added costs for expanded computer help desks, work-study jobs for students who provide emergency technical assistance in dormitories, and training for reluctant, old-fashioned faculty.

The New York Times

"In addition to lost revenues, airlines will incur added costs for rerouting of aircraft, care for stranded passengers and stranded aircraft at various ports," said spokesman Anthony Concil.

The Guardian

The manufacturers fear unintended consequences if the bill were to succeed: added costs for research of copyrighted designs, legal fees and delays in getting their clothes into stores.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing budget overruns or unexpected expenses, use "added cost for" to clearly communicate the reason behind the increased spending. Be specific about what the cost is for.

Common error

Avoid using "added cost for" when referring to the original, planned expenses. This phrase should only denote costs that were not initially accounted for.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "added cost for" functions as a noun phrase followed by a preposition, typically modifying another noun or verb. It identifies an expense incurred in addition to a base cost. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

30%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "added cost for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for denoting additional expenses. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and usability. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science contexts, this phrase serves to clarify the reason behind extra expenses, with appropriate alternatives including "additional expense for" and "extra charge for". When employing this phrase, ensure that it accurately reflects new expenses and is not confused with initial costs. By adhering to these guidelines, you can effectively communicate financial information with precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Additional expense for

Replaces "added cost" with "additional expense", maintaining the core meaning but using a slightly more formal tone.

Extra charge for

Substitutes "added cost" with "extra charge", providing a more direct and transactional feel.

Supplementary fee for

Employs "supplementary fee" instead of "added cost", which can sound more official or bureaucratic.

Increased expenditure for

Replaces "added cost" with "increased expenditure", suitable for financial or accounting contexts.

Additional outlay for

Uses "outlay" instead of "cost", implying a more significant investment or expenditure.

Incremental cost for

Specifies that the cost is increasing by increments.

Associated cost for

Highlights the relationship between a specific item and its cost.

Resulting cost for

Indicates that the cost is a consequence of something else.

Ensuring cost for

This implies an action that guarantees that a cost is paid for something.

Attributable cost for

This specifies the cost that can be related to a certain reason.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "added cost for" in a business context?

In a business setting, consider using phrases such as "additional expense for", "supplementary fee for", or "incremental cost for" for a more formal tone.

What's a more casual way to say "added cost for"?

For a more informal tone, you could use "extra charge for" or simply "additional fee for" depending on your audience and the context.

Is it ever incorrect to use "added cost for"?

While grammatically correct, using "added cost for" might be misleading if the cost was already included in the original estimate. Ensure the cost is truly an addition to what was initially planned or expected.

What's the difference between "added cost for" and "associated cost for"?

"Added cost for" implies a new or extra expense. "Associated cost for" refers to expenses that are related or linked to a particular item or activity but not necessarily new.