adaptable obligations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "adaptable obligations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where flexibility in responsibilities or commitments is being discussed. Example: "In our new project, we have established adaptable obligations to ensure that team members can adjust their roles as needed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

They are very adaptable".

The Guardian

I'm very adaptable.

The New Yorker

It's adaptable.

The New Yorker

They keep you adaptable".

The Guardian

I feel very adaptable".

The Guardian

Al Qaeda proved adaptable.

The New York Times

Pastes are adaptable.

The New York Times - Magazine

Words are wonderfully adaptable.

The New York Times - Arts

The United States is adaptable.

The New York Times

"We are very adaptable".

The New York Times

What else? A. Adaptable.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In contracts, specify certain clauses as "adaptable obligations" to allow for modifications based on unforeseen circumstances or evolving project requirements.

Common error

While "adaptable obligations" suggests flexibility, overuse in formal documents can imply a lack of commitment. Opt for more precise terms like "flexible responsibilities" or "modifiable commitments" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adaptable obligations" functions as a descriptive term, combining an adjective ("adaptable") with a noun ("obligations"). It characterizes the nature of duties or responsibilities, indicating that they are subject to change or modification. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "adaptable obligations" is grammatically correct but currently exhibits limited real-world usage. It functions as a descriptive term indicating duties or responsibilities that can be adjusted to changing circumstances. While suitable for professional contexts, more precise alternatives like "flexible responsibilities" or "modifiable commitments" might be preferable in highly formal settings. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, however, the examples of usages are currently not available.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adjustable responsibilities

Substitutes "obligations" with "responsibilities", suggesting a broader scope of accountability that can be altered.

flexible duties

Replaces "obligations" with "duties", implying a slightly less formal set of responsibilities.

fluid responsibilities

Emphasizes the ease and seamlessness of adapting to changing needs.

modifiable commitments

Replaces both "adaptable" and "obligations" offering a more formal and emphatic tone regarding changeable agreements.

changeable duties

Highlights the capacity to alter assigned tasks or responsibilities as needed.

responsive commitments

Highlights the reactive nature of the commitments, emphasizing their ability to adjust to external changes.

versatile responsibilities

Focuses on the wide range of applications and contexts the responsibilities can cover.

pliable obligations

Indicates obligations that are easily influenced or shaped.

customizable duties

Emphasizes the potential for personalized or tailored adjustments to responsibilities.

elastic commitments

Implies a degree of flexibility and resilience in the commitments, allowing them to stretch and adapt without breaking.

FAQs

How can I use "adaptable obligations" in a sentence?

You might say, "Our team operates under adaptable obligations, allowing members to shift roles based on project needs", emphasizing the flexibility within the team.

What are some alternatives to "adaptable obligations"?

Consider using "flexible duties", "adjustable responsibilities", or "modifiable commitments" depending on the context and desired level of formality.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use the term "adaptable obligations"?

This term is suitable in project management, team collaborations, or contracts where a degree of flexibility and modification is anticipated and required.

Is "adaptable obligations" formal or informal?

The term is relatively neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, in highly formal legal or business documents, more precise alternatives might be preferred.