across all

USAGE SUMMARY

"across all" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something occurs or affects an entire group or range of people or things, for example: "We saw a 50% increase in customer engagement across all demographics."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They cut across all styles.

The New York Times - Arts

It cuts across all fields.

The Economist

Across all platforms.

The Guardian

"That's across all sports".

The New York Times - Sports

The shortage cuts across all treatment categories.

The New York Times - Health

This cuts across all categories of voter.

The Economist

That applies across all our businesses".

The New York Times - Tech

It cuts across all economic lines.

The New York Times

"Iman cuts across all ages and experiences.

The New York Times

They chose subsidies, across all parties.

The Economist

"It cuts across all demographic groups.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing, carefully consider whether "in all" might be a more concise and equally effective alternative to "across all".

Common error

Avoid using "across all" when the context already implies totality or universality. For example, instead of saying "It applies across all possible scenarios", you can simply say "It applies in all scenarios" or "It always applies" to prevent redundancy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "across all" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun, adjective, or verb to indicate that something applies or extends to every member of a specified group or category. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

31%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Academia

7%

Wiki

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "across all" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to denote inclusivity and universality. Grammatically sound and very common across various domains, from news and media to scientific literature, "across all" emphasizes that something applies without exception within a specified range. Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability. While alternatives like "in all" or "throughout all" exist, "across all" provides a clear and effective way to convey comprehensiveness in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

throughout all

Replaces "across" with "throughout", emphasizing distribution over an area or time period.

in all

A more concise alternative, implying a complete inclusion within a defined set.

spanning all

Focuses on the extent or range covered, suggesting a connection across different elements.

encompassing all

Highlights the inclusion of everything within a specific category or boundary.

covering all

Emphasizes the scope of influence or application to every item in a group.

for all

Indicates a general application or suitability to everyone or everything.

to all

Denotes direction or applicability towards every member of a group or set.

among all

Suggests a consideration or comparison involving every item within a group.

in every

Emphasizes individual instances within a larger context, implying universality.

universally

An adverbial form denoting application or occurrence in every instance or case.

FAQs

How can I use "across all" in a sentence?

You can use "across all" to indicate that something applies to every member of a group or category, as in "The new policy applies "across all" departments".

What are some alternatives to "across all"?

Alternatives include "in all", "throughout all", or "spanning all", depending on the context. Each emphasizes a slightly different aspect of comprehensiveness.

Is "across all" formal or informal?

"Across all" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, though alternatives may be more appropriate depending on the specific tone and audience.

How does "across all" differ from "for all"?

"Across all" typically refers to a range or scope of application, while "for all" implies a general suitability or benefit. For example, "This rule applies "across all" teams" versus "This resource is available "for all" employees".