Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
acknowledged for contribution
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "acknowledged for contribution" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when recognizing someone's efforts or input in a particular context, such as a project or collaboration. Example: "She was acknowledged for her contribution to the research project during the award ceremony."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Ase H. Garseth is acknowledged for contribution of samples from wild salmon.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
Finally, it acknowledges for contributions for the organization of the 14th ISGdR.
Science
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/14/213/prepub Laboratory technician Dorte Ekner and data manager Isabella Gomez Carneiro are acknowledged for their contribution to data collection systematization and physiotherapist Klaus Hansen for his contribution to the protocol of physical capacity measurements.
Moreover, M.S. Manuela Alagna is acknowledged for her contribution.
Science
The submitters are duly acknowledged for their contribution as each annotation or entry is author and time stamped.
Science
Psychological (human) factors have been acknowledged for their contribution in affecting behaviour, including low carbon behaviour and impede carbon emissions impacts.
Chapman's paper, "Planning for conjunctive goals", has been widely acknowledged for its contribution toward understanding the nature of partial-order planning, and it has been one of the bases of later work by others but it is not free of problems.
Science
Isabelle Seguin and each of the site study coordinators are gratefully acknowledged for their contribution to this study.
Science
Clara Kolster is acknowledged for her contribution to the study.
Science
The Finnish Defense Forces are acknowledged for their contribution to the study.
All the collectors, botanical gardens and herbaria are acknowledged for their contribution to supplying material.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "acknowledged for contribution", clearly state what specific contribution is being recognized to provide context and avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "acknowledged for contribution" excessively in formal writing. Opt for stronger verbs like "recognized", "credited", or "praised" to vary your language and maintain reader engagement.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "acknowledged for contribution" functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone or something has received recognition for their efforts. As Ludwig AI reports, it is usable in written English, and the provided examples showcase its direct application in academic and professional contexts.
Frequent in
Science
70%
News & Media
15%
Formal & Business
15%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "acknowledged for contribution" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for recognizing someone's efforts or input. As Ludwig AI states, it is a valid and usable phrase. Its usage is most common in scientific and formal contexts, but it is also seen in news and media. The phrase functions to formally credit contributions, and suitable alternatives include "recognized for input" or "appreciated for efforts". Remember to specify the contribution when using this phrase to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Valued for contribution
Highlights the worthiness of the contribution made.
Recognized for input
This alternative focuses on the specific input provided by someone, highlighting its recognition.
Appreciated for efforts
This phrase emphasizes the appreciation of the work and dedication invested.
Credited for assistance
This option highlights the support provided, giving credit where it's due.
Lauded for involvement
This alternative suggests high praise for someone's active participation.
Thanked for participation
This phrase conveys gratitude for taking part in something.
Distinguished for participation
Focuses on having excellence in involvement.
Commended for support
Focuses on the positive evaluation of backing or assistance.
Praised for work
This option emphasizes the positive feedback on the task done.
Given recognition for role
This alternative underscores formal acknowledgement of the function.
FAQs
How can I use "acknowledged for contribution" in a sentence?
You can use "acknowledged for contribution" to give credit to someone whose efforts helped to improve a project. Example: "She was "acknowledged for contribution" during the award ceremony".
What are some alternatives to "acknowledged for contribution"?
Alternatives include "recognized for input", "appreciated for efforts", or "credited for assistance". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "acknowledged for their contribution" or "acknowledged for contribution"?
The phrase "acknowledged for contribution" is generally used when the contributor is singular. For multiple contributors, "acknowledged for their contributions" is more appropriate. The plural form acknowledges more than one person's efforts.
What's the difference between "acknowledged for contribution" and "recognized for contribution"?
While both phrases indicate appreciation for someone's efforts, "recognized for contribution" ("recognized for contribution") may imply a more formal or public acknowledgement compared to "acknowledged for contribution".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested