accused by

USAGE SUMMARY

"accused by" is correct and usable in written English.
You would use this phrase when someone has made a formal accusation against someone else. For example: "The suspect was accused by the police of committing fraud."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Both officers were also accused by Perez of other wrongdoing.

The New Yorker

They have been accused by some of ignorance and racism.

The Guardian - Opinion

Franzen is accused by his peers of snobbery and hubris.

The Guardian

But they said they were accused by ministers of scaremongering.

The Guardian

Accused by Cameron of "weaponising" the NHS, Miliband hit back.

The Guardian

Television is often accused by faith leaders of marginalising religion.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

The bank was accused by the federal government last week of defrauding investors during the crisis.

The New York Times

Even so, his office was recently accused by a UN official of harassing human-rights activists.

The Economist

The firm was accused by Massachusetts's top financial authority of improperly influencing the offering.

The New York Times

Emirates is often accused by envious Europeans of growing thanks to state subsidies.

The Economist

"He was publicly accused by his high school social studies teacher of deceptive behavior".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "accused by" when indicating formal charges or serious allegations rather than minor complaints. This helps maintain the appropriate tone and seriousness of the situation.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by always specifying who is making the accusation. Saying "He was accused" leaves the reader wondering who made the accusation, diminishing the sentence's clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "accused by" functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a verb, indicating the agent making the accusation. It clarifies who is leveling the charge against someone. Ludwig AI examples support this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Academia

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "accused by" is a grammatically correct and frequently used prepositional phrase that serves to specify the source of an accusation. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase commonly appears in news and media, wiki, and scientific contexts, demonstrating its versatility across various registers. To ensure clarity in writing, always specify both the accuser and the accused. Related phrases, such as "alleged by" or "implicated by", can offer nuanced alternatives depending on the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

charged by

Replaces "accused" with "charged", emphasizing a formal legal accusation.

indicted by

Uses "indicted" instead of "accused", specifically referring to a formal accusation by a grand jury.

arraigned by

Substitutes "accused" with "arraigned", specifying the formal reading of charges in a court setting.

alleged by

Uses "alleged" instead of "accused", implying the accusation is yet to be proven.

impeached by

Uses "impeached" instead of "accused", specific to formal charges against a public official.

implicated by

Replaces "accused" with "implicated", suggesting involvement in wrongdoing without a formal charge.

prosecuted by

Replaces "accused" with "prosecuted", highlighting the legal process of pursuing charges in court.

blamed by

Substitutes "accused" with "blamed", indicating an assignment of responsibility for something negative.

denounced by

Replaces "accused" with "denounced", suggesting a public condemnation.

fingered by

Substitutes "accused" with "fingered", indicating someone has been pointed out as the culprit.

FAQs

How can I use "accused by" in a sentence?

Use "accused by" to indicate that someone has made a formal charge or allegation against another person. For example, "The senator was "accused by" his colleagues of corruption".

What are some alternatives to "accused by"?

Alternatives include phrases like "alleged by", "blamed by", or "implicated by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "accused of" or "accused by"?

"Accused of" indicates the specific charge or crime, while "accused by" identifies the accuser. For example, "He was accused of theft" versus "He was "accused by" the store owner".

What's the difference between "accused by" and "charged by"?

"Charged by" typically refers to a formal legal charge brought by authorities, while "accused by" can refer to accusations made by anyone, not just legal entities. In other words being "charged by" has stricter legal implications.