accounting for the difference

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "accounting for the difference" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when explaining or justifying a discrepancy or variation in data, results, or observations. Example: "The report highlights several factors accounting for the difference in sales figures between the two quarters."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

The mean number of articles was also calculated separately for the different newspaper categories, accounting for the difference in number of newspapers in each of the categories.

BMJ Open

The method of equivalent electric circuits was used to derive an approximate formula for the transformation ratio for no-load conditions without accounting for the difference between elastic compliance in different sections, which may be 10 15%.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

APOE ε4 prevalence may differ regionally, possibly accounting for the difference in ε4 proportions observed in these analyses.

Alzheimer's Research and Therapy

Thus normalization can be used to compare the data between arrays (representing different samples) by accounting for the difference in signal intensities on the two arrays as measured by the signals from the positive controls on those arrays.

Arthritis Research and Therapy

The settings of these studies differ importantly from the Canadian context, possibly accounting for the difference in findings.

BMJ Open

Accounting for the difference in popular reaction between 1980 and now, however, goes beyond the arrival of 100 satellite channels, Facebook and Twitter.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

These could account for the difference of its properties among different laboratories.

Plosone

Yet differing reporting methods may also account for the difference.

The New York Times

What accounts for the difference?

The New York Times

Then what does account for the difference?

The New Yorker

How do you account for the difference?

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "accounting for the difference", ensure that the explanation directly relates to the specific variation you are addressing for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "accounting for the difference" without providing specific details. Instead of saying "factors accounting for the difference", specify the actual factors at play to enhance the statement's informativeness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "accounting for the difference" functions as a causal connector, indicating a reason or explanation for a discrepancy. It introduces the factors that explain why two or more things are not the same. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

25%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "accounting for the difference" is a versatile causal connector used to explain or justify discrepancies across various fields. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage, particularly in scientific and news contexts. While related phrases like "explaining the discrepancy" and "justifying the variation" offer similar meanings, they may imply slightly different nuances. When employing "accounting for the difference", ensure that your explanation is specific and directly relevant to the observed variation to maintain clarity and enhance the statement's informativeness. The prevalence of this phrase in authoritative sources such as The New York Times and BMJ Open underscores its reliability and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

explaining the discrepancy

Focuses on the act of explaining a difference, rather than the reason behind it.

justifying the variation

Highlights the act of providing reasons to support or defend a difference.

reconciling the disparity

Implies bringing two differing things into agreement or harmony.

attributing the divergence to

Focuses on identifying a cause or factor responsible for the difference.

identifying reasons for the gap

Emphasizes finding the causes behind a separation or lack of connection.

determining factors influencing the difference

Highlights the process of pinpointing which elements are responsible for the variation.

unraveling the source of the difference

Suggests a more complex or mysterious difference that needs to be understood.

elucidating the reasons behind the difference

Focuses on making the reasons for a difference clear and understandable.

shedding light on the variation

Suggests uncovering or revealing information about the difference.

clarifying the difference's cause

Emphasizes the process of making the origin of the difference more clear.

FAQs

How can I use "accounting for the difference" in a sentence?

Use "accounting for the difference" to explain or justify a variation between two or more things. For example: "The new policy is "accounting for the difference" in employee performance."

What phrases are similar to "accounting for the difference"?

Alternatives include "explaining the discrepancy", "justifying the variation", or "reconciling the disparity" depending on the specific context.

Which is more appropriate: "accounting for the difference" or "account for the difference"?

"Accounting for the difference" is a present participle phrase often used as a gerund or part of a larger sentence structure. "Account for the difference" is an imperative or infinitive form, used to request or describe the act of explaining a difference.

What's the difference between "explaining the difference" and "accounting for the difference"?

"Explaining the difference" simply describes the act of providing an explanation, while ""accounting for the difference"" implies providing a justification or reason that resolves the discrepancy. The latter suggests a more comprehensive explanation.