Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
accessible for collaboration
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "accessible for collaboration" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a space, platform, or resource that is open and available for people to work together. Example: "The new online platform is designed to be accessible for collaboration among team members, allowing for seamless communication and project management."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
People previously known only through reputation (heard them speak at a conference, or read their published research) or an indirect contact (e.g. a colleague of a colleague) may now be accessible for collaboration through the structure of the network.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
It has been distributed to colleagues in India and Argentina who are interested in identifying new alleles in European winter wheat and is accessible for further collaboration.
The same goes for collaboration.
News & Media
"It is great for collaboration.
News & Media
Train for collaboration.
News & Media
Should it be for collaboration?
News & Media
Clarke unwaveringly spoke for collaboration and peace.
News & Media
Any plans for collaboration were off.
News & Media
Implementation 2002: Opportunities for Collaboration.
Science & Research
"Reliability is a great asset for collaboration.
Science & Research
I saw endless opportunities for collaboration".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing digital tools or platforms, use "accessible for collaboration" to highlight user-friendliness and ease of teamwork.
Common error
Avoid redundancy by ensuring that the context doesn't already imply accessibility. For example, saying "make the document accessible for collaboration" is unnecessary if the document is inherently designed for shared editing.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "accessible for collaboration" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, describing the characteristic of being easily used or reached for the purpose of collaborative work. It indicates that something is designed or suitable to facilitate teamwork.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Science
33%
Formal & Business
33%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "accessible for collaboration" is grammatically correct and serves to describe resources or environments that facilitate teamwork. Ludwig AI validates this by noting its usability in written English. While alternatives like ""available for collaboration"" or ""open to collaboration"" exist, the key is to use it in contexts where ease of use and suitability for teamwork are emphasized. It is commonly found in professional settings and news articles, highlighting its relevance in describing modern work environments and digital tools. Avoid redundancy by ensuring that the context doesn't already imply accessibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
available for collaboration
Focuses on the availability aspect more than the ease of access.
open to collaboration
Emphasizes willingness and receptiveness to collaboration.
suitable for collaboration
Highlights the appropriateness or fitness for collaborative work.
designed for collaboration
Indicates that something was specifically created to facilitate collaboration.
facilitating collaboration
Describes the action of making collaboration easier.
conducive to collaboration
Highlights that something creates a favorable environment for collaboration.
easy to collaborate on
Focuses on the ease of the collaborative process itself.
collaboration-friendly
A more informal way of saying something is good for collaboration.
collaboration-ready
Suggests a state of preparedness and suitability for immediate collaboration.
accessible for joint work
Replaces "collaboration" with "joint work" to broaden the phrasing.
FAQs
How can I use "accessible for collaboration" in a sentence?
You can use "accessible for collaboration" to describe resources, platforms, or environments that facilitate teamwork. For example, "The online workspace is designed to be highly "accessible for collaboration" among team members."
What are some alternatives to "accessible for collaboration"?
Alternatives include "available for collaboration", "open to collaboration", or "suitable for collaboration", depending on the specific context you wish to emphasize.
Is it better to say "accessible for collaboration" or "accessible to collaboration"?
"Accessible for collaboration" is generally preferred because it indicates suitability or design for collaborative activities. "Accessible to collaboration" might imply a physical or conceptual barrier that needs to be overcome to enable collaboration.
What makes a resource truly "accessible for collaboration"?
A resource that is truly "accessible for collaboration" typically features ease of use, clear communication channels, shared editing capabilities, and compatibility across different devices and platforms, enabling seamless teamwork.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested