accepted with

USAGE SUMMARY

"accepted with" is correct and usable in written English, and can be used to indicate that something has been accepted in a particular situation.
For example: The offer of employment was accepted with enthusiasm.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Swaps are then accepted with normal Metropolis–Hasting acceptance probability.

Bioinformatics

Donations accepted with ASPCA.

The New York Times

This, too, Mailer accepted, with misgivings.

The New Yorker

She was accepted, with a substantial scholarship.

The New Yorker

She had accepted with alacrity.

The Guardian - Books

You're accepted with open arms.

The New York Times

They are accepted with equal reluctance.

The New Yorker

Yanin's resignation was accepted with little protest.

The New Yorker

It's a challenge they've accepted with alacrity.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

I accepted with a thank you.

The New York Times

He accepted with a message for Theresa May.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "accepted with", ensure the noun following 'with' clearly describes the manner, feeling, or condition accompanying the acceptance (e.g., "accepted with gratitude", "accepted with caution").

Common error

Avoid pairing "accepted with" with vague nouns that don't provide specific context about the acceptance. For instance, instead of saying "accepted with interest", specify the type of interest, such as "accepted with keen interest" or "accepted with cautious interest".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "accepted with" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb, typically indicating the manner, feeling, or condition under which something was accepted. It provides additional context about the acceptance itself, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

36%

Formal & Business

26%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "accepted with" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to enrich the meaning of acceptance by specifying the manner or emotional state in which it occurred. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage. Appearing frequently in news media and scientific publications, it maintains a neutral register suitable for various writing contexts. To ensure clarity, pair it with specific nouns that detail the acceptance's accompanying factors. By avoiding vagueness, you can effectively communicate the subtle nuances of agreement or reception.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received with

Indicates how something was welcomed or greeted; a more general term than "accepted with".

met with

Describes the reaction or response to something, implying a more neutral or potentially confrontational reception.

greeted with

Suggests a specific form of welcome or acknowledgement.

regarded with

Implies a particular attitude or opinion is held toward something, focusing on the perception rather than the acceptance.

viewed with

Similar to 'regarded with', emphasizing the manner in which something is considered or perceived.

acknowledged with

Highlights the recognition or admission of something, differing from simple acceptance.

assented to with

A more formal way of saying 'agreed with', indicating compliance or approval.

consented to with

Implies permission or agreement given, often in legal or official contexts.

acquiesced in with

Suggests reluctant acceptance without protest.

concurred with

Implies formal agreement or accordance with a statement or opinion.

FAQs

How can I use "accepted with" in a sentence?

Use "accepted with" to describe the manner or feeling accompanying an acceptance. For example, "The proposal was "accepted with enthusiasm"" or "The apology was "accepted with reservations"".

What are some alternatives to "accepted with"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "received with", "met with", or "greeted with" to convey a similar meaning. The best choice depends on the nuance you want to express.

Is it redundant to say "accepted with" if acceptance already implies a positive connotation?

While acceptance often implies a positive connotation, using "accepted with" allows you to specify the degree or manner of acceptance. It provides additional context, indicating whether the acceptance was enthusiastic, reluctant, or cautious.

How does "accepted with" differ from "agreed to with"?

"Accepted with" generally describes the reception of something offered, while "agreed to with" implies a mutual agreement on terms or conditions. For example, one might say "The terms were "agreed to with some hesitation"", but "The gift was "accepted with gratitude"".