met with

USAGE SUMMARY

"met with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is a verb phrase that implies a meeting has happened, or will happen, between people. For example, "John met with the client to discuss the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Kroll met with Marsh.

The New Yorker

I met with people.

The New Yorker

I met with her.

The New York Times

Harroun eventually met with him.

The New Yorker

They have met with resistance.

Independent

Adversity is met with stoicism.

The Economist

They met with failure, too.

The New York Times - Sports

"I was met with giggles.

The New York Times

These met with limited opposition.

The Economist

It met with considerable acclaim.

The Economist

Neither opera met with success.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing reactions, ensure the subject of "met with" is the entity experiencing the reaction, not the reaction itself.

Common error

Avoid using "met with" to describe continuous or habitual actions. "Met with" implies a specific encounter, not a recurring situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "met with" functions primarily as a verb phrase, indicating the action of encountering someone or something. This is evident in the examples where it describes meetings, such as "I met with Hilton", and reactions, such as "Our protest was met with a shrug". Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Encyclopedias

11%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Science

4%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "met with" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to describe encounters or reactions. As confirmed by Ludwig, it sees frequent use across various platforms and contexts, but it is especially common in News & Media. It is a verb phrase primarily used to describe an interaction or response, making it a useful addition to anyone's vocabulary.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had a meeting with

Directly indicates a formal meeting took place, interchangeable in many contexts.

conferred with

Suggests a more formal or official meeting for discussion.

held discussions with

Highlights the act of discussing topics during the meeting.

was met by

Emphasizes the reception or greeting received, similar to describing a reaction.

encountered

Focuses on the experience of facing something, similar to "met with" in the context of reactions.

sat down with

Implies a more casual meeting or discussion.

faced

Highlights confronting a situation or response, akin to "met with" when describing reactions.

touched base with

Indicates a brief meeting or communication, often in a business setting.

negotiated with

Suggests a meeting focused on reaching an agreement or compromise.

engaged with

Highlights the interaction or involvement experienced.

FAQs

What does "met with" mean?

"Met with" indicates that a meeting or encounter has taken place between people or entities. It can also describe a reaction or response received.

How can I use "met with" in a sentence?

You can use "met with" to describe a scheduled meeting, such as "I "had a meeting with" the manager". It's also used to describe responses, like "The proposal "was met by" criticism".

What's the difference between "met with" and "encountered"?

"Met with" typically refers to a planned meeting or a specific reaction. "Encountered" implies a chance meeting or facing an unexpected situation. Depending on the context, "encountered" may be a suitable alternative.

What are some alternatives to "met with"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like ""had a meeting with"", "conferred with", or ""was met by"" to convey similar meanings.