abuses against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "abuses against" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the word "against" is unnecessary when referring to abuses. Example: "The report highlights the various abuses faced by the community."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But the government's abuses against Tamils may prove even costlier.

The Economist

-- Human rights abuses against refugees currently located in Chad.

The Guardian

But abuses against lawyers can only exacerbate social unrest.

The New York Times

The deforestation has been accompanied by abuses against indigenous groups, including harassment and illegal evictions.

The Economist

Mr Pastrana is facing mounting criticism over reported FARC abuses against civilians in the zone.

The Economist

And the global human-rights abuses against L.G.B.T. people are, of course, staggering.

The New Yorker

When people are dehumanized we know from experience that abuses against them are more likely.

The New York Times

"It is not accidental that the democratization of Myanmar has been accompanied by horrendous abuses against the Rohingya," he said.

Columbia University

Zimova spoke last week at Harvard Law School about the challenges of fighting human rights abuses against the Roma.

Harvard University

Sarah Ravani, '16 M.S., reported on a campaign to raise awareness of abuses against the Baha'i community in New York.

Columbia University

A number of Latin American nations, protesting abuses against Sudanese Christians, also decided to back Mauritius.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer using "abuses of" or "abuses against" followed by the abused entity. For example, instead of saying "abuses against refugees", say "abuses of refugees" or "abuses towards refugees".

Common error

Do not use "against" after "abuses". It's often redundant and grammatically awkward. Simply use "abuses" followed by the subject being abused, or rephrase using "abuse of" or "abuse towards".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "abuses against" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to identify the recipient of harmful actions. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically incorrect and often redundant. The intended meaning is usually to indicate what or whom the abuses are directed at.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "abuses against" is commonly used, it is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. The phrase typically functions to highlight mistreatment or violations inflicted on a particular group. Although common across various sources, including news and media, academia, and science, it is advisable to use alternatives such as "abuses of", "abuses towards", or simply "abuses" without a preposition for better grammatical correctness. To avoid redundancy, focusing on alternatives is a best practice for clear and accurate communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

maltreatment of

Replaces "abuses" with a synonym and uses "of" instead of "against".

ill-treatment of

Similar to "maltreatment of", offering a close synonym.

misuse of power

Focuses on abuse related to authority or position.

exploitation of

Highlights the exploitative nature of the abuse.

violations against

Emphasizes the breaking of rules or rights.

offenses against

Another term for rule-breaking, similar to 'violations'.

wrongful treatment of

Expresses the injustice of the abuse.

persecution of

Indicates systematic and sustained abuse.

oppression of

Highlights the power dynamics involved in the abuse.

infringement on the rights of

Focuses specifically on the violation of rights.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the word "abuses" in a sentence?

Instead of saying "abuses against", you can say "abuse of" or simply "abuses". For example, "the abuses of power" or "the abuses faced by the community".

What prepositions can I use with "abuses"?

While "abuses against" is grammatically questionable, "abuses of" or "abuses towards" are acceptable alternatives, as well as simply using "abuses" without a preposition.

Is there a difference between "abuses against" and "abuses of"?

While both phrases are used, "abuses of" is generally considered grammatically correct. "Abuses against" may sound awkward or redundant to some native English speakers.

What are some alternatives to "abuses against" that I can use in my writing?

Consider using "maltreatment of", "ill-treatment of", or simply "abuses" with no preposition, depending on the context. These options are generally considered more grammatically sound.