Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

able to contain

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "able to contain" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the capacity or capability of something to hold or include another element. Example: "The new storage unit is able to contain all of our seasonal decorations without any issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

I was barely able to contain myself".

News & Media

The Guardian

We weren't going to be able to contain ourselves.

News & Media

The New Yorker

How Rinat was able to contain so much staggered me.

She is barely able to contain her delight.

News & Media

The Guardian

Since we were not able to contain them".

News & Media

Independent

We were able to contain them somehow and sneak a point out of it".

Here are the torches!" said Pete, barely able to contain his excitement.

And no one on the team, particularly the point guards, seems able to contain his man.

"The government is hoping the unions will be able to contain public anger".

News & Media

The New York Times

He appeared barely able to contain his disappointment in me or his fears for my future.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Black counts on being able to contain the advanced passed d pawn after 17 d6.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "able to contain", ensure the subject performing the action and the object being contained are clearly defined for clarity. For example, "The dam is able to contain the floodwaters effectively."

Common error

Avoid using "able to contain" when a more specific verb would provide greater precision. For example, instead of "The box is able to contain books", consider "The box holds books" if simply holding is the intended meaning.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "able to contain" functions primarily as a descriptor, indicating the capacity or capability of a subject to hold, manage, or control something. Ludwig provides many examples where it describes physical containment, emotional control or managing abstract concepts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "able to contain" is a versatile phrase used to express the capacity or capability to hold, manage, or control something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage, supported by numerous examples across varied sources. The phrase is most frequently encountered in news and media contexts, though it also appears in scientific and business writing. While the phrase is generally appropriate, writers should ensure clarity and precision when deploying it, avoiding overgeneralization by considering more specific verbs where appropriate. Consider alternative phrases like "capable of containing" or "equipped to contain" to add nuance to your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "able to contain" in a sentence?

You can use "able to contain" to describe something's capacity or capability. For example, "The stadium is "able to contain" 50,000 spectators", or "This hard drive is "able to contain" all your important documents".

What are some alternatives to saying "able to contain"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "capable of holding", "can hold", or "has the capacity to contain".

Is it correct to say "able to contain to"?

No, the correct phrasing is "able to contain". The word "to" should not be repeated after "contain". Using "able to contain to" is grammatically incorrect.

What is the difference between "able to contain" and "likely to contain"?

"Able to contain" indicates a capability or capacity, while "likely to contain" suggests a probability. For instance, "The container is "able to contain" liquids" means it has the capacity, whereas "The sample is likely to contain bacteria" means it probably does.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: