ability to eradicate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ability to eradicate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the capacity or power to eliminate or remove something completely. Example: "The researchers are exploring the ability to eradicate the disease through advanced medical treatments."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

Here again, the ability to eradicate insomnia is mentioned as a key consequence of winning.

The New York Times - Sports

People who remain skeptical about the ability to eradicate breast cancer should look to the history of cervical cancer, she said.

The New York Times

But Mr. Maldonado acknowledged that efforts to keep hydrants shut would depend on the city's ability to eradicate a long-cherished summer practice.

The New York Times

Re "C.I.A. Vaccine Ruse May Have Harmed the War on Polio" (July 10): Having a physician run a sham vaccination campaign to find terrorist suspects adversely affects far more than the ability to eradicate polio.

The New York Times - Science

Public confidence is low in the government's ability to eradicate graft, and many people have embraced the idea of an independent Lokpal agency, beyond the controls of political parties.

The New York Times

It was discovered in the 1970s and named for its apparent ability to eradicate tumors in mice.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

This was postulated to be due to its ability to eradicate the anaerobic BLPB present in lung abscess.

BMC Infectious Diseases

For this reason, while immunity contributes to the control of M. tuberculosis, immunity can, at the same time, frustrate the ability of drugs to eradicate it (15 – 15).

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Our results are consistent with a previous study by Busa et al. reporting the ability of salinomycin to eradicate treatment-resistant phenotypes in HNSCC.

BMC Cancer

Mr. Singh is probably the only Indian prime minister to profess a love for capitalism and for the ability of private enterprise to eradicate poverty.

The New York Times

However, poor countries in Asia, such as Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and Laos, lack the veterinary facilities for surveillance of the disease in animals, the laboratories to test samples and the ability to respond swiftly to eradicate outbreaks.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing long-term goals, use "ability to eradicate" to convey a sense of finality and completeness, such as in "the ability to eradicate poverty".

Common error

Avoid using "ability to eradicate" when a simpler term like "ability to reduce" or "ability to manage" would be more appropriate. "Eradicate" implies complete removal, so reserve it for situations where that is the realistic goal.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ability to eradicate" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. Examples show it expressing the capacity to completely eliminate something, such as diseases or undesirable practices.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

38%

Formal & Business

21%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "ability to eradicate" is a grammatically sound and frequently used noun phrase that signifies the capacity to completely eliminate something. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. Predominantly found in science, news, and formal business contexts, it conveys a sense of finality and long-term impact. While effective, be mindful of using it appropriately, reserving it for situations where complete elimination is a realistic and intended outcome. Consider related phrases like "capacity to eliminate" or "power to remove" for slight nuances in meaning. Authoritative sources such as The New York Times and Forbes frequently employ this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

capacity to eliminate

Replaces "ability" with "capacity", focusing on potential rather than inherent skill.

power to remove

Substitutes "ability" and "eradicate" with "power" and "remove", suggesting force and extraction.

capability to abolish

Uses "capability" and "abolish", highlighting the potential to formally put an end to something.

potential to wipe out

Emphasizes the possibility of complete destruction or removal.

skill at eliminating

Highlights the proficiency in the act of removing something effectively.

means of exterminating

Indicates a method or resource used for complete destruction.

resources for obliterating

Focuses on the available resources to completely erase or destroy something.

prospects for crushing

Suggests the likelihood of suppressing or defeating something completely.

chance to eradicate

Focuses on the opportunity to completely remove something.

option to eliminate

Highlights the availability of choice in removing something.

FAQs

How can I use "ability to eradicate" in a sentence?

You can use "ability to eradicate" when discussing the capacity to completely eliminate something, such as "The new policy aims to enhance the "ability to eradicate" corruption within the government".

What are some alternatives to "ability to eradicate"?

Alternatives include "capacity to eliminate", "power to remove", or "capability to abolish" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "ability of eradicating" instead of "ability to eradicate"?

While "eradicating" is a gerund, the correct and more common construction is "ability to eradicate", using the infinitive form.

What is the difference between "ability to control" and "ability to eradicate"?

"Ability to control" implies managing or limiting something, while "ability to eradicate" suggests completely eliminating it. For example, one might have the ability to control a disease but not the "ability to eradicate" it.