abilities to regulate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "abilities to regulate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing someone's or something's capacity to control or manage a particular situation or set of circumstances. Example: "The new software has enhanced abilities to regulate user access and permissions effectively."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

Women have been reported to use more emotion-regulation strategies than do men and to have more abilities to regulate their emotions in a different way.

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Advocates of the law, along with Oregon officials, contend that Mr. Ashcroft has grossly exceeded the terms of the federal controlled-substances law, which they say was intended to prevent illegal trafficking of drugs when it was passed three decades ago but not to interfere with states' abilities to regulate the practice of medicine.

The New York Times

But the new investment provisions embedded in the trade agreements that the Obama administration is negotiating across both oceans imply that accompanying any such foreign direct investment comes a marked reduction in governments' abilities to regulate the environment, health, working conditions, and even the economy.

The Guardian - Business

Triterpene derivatives had abilities to regulate glucose and lipid metabolism.

Chemistry Central Journal

The "Dangerous" Argument: Federal laws will pre-empt states' abilities to regulate fintechs within their borders.

TechCrunch

The FCC has even taken up the cause in an attempt to strike a balance between carriers' and states' abilities to regulate the fees customers are charged.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

Co-regulation requires the ability to regulate one another's motivation, emotion, cognition, and metacognition.

Smart Learning Environments

People without the ability to regulate themselves, and without a network of regulating relationships".

Huffington Post

But has our technology outstripped our ability to regulate it?

The New York Times

Parliamentary enquiries have questioned its ability to regulate effectively.

The Economist

There are indeed limits to the law's ability to regulate human behavior.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "abilities to regulate", ensure that the context clearly specifies what is being regulated. Providing specific details enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "abilities to regulate" in overly broad or vague contexts. Always specify the area or aspect being regulated to provide a clear and focused meaning. For example, instead of saying "the system has abilities to regulate", specify "the system has abilities to regulate temperature and pressure".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "abilities to regulate" functions as a noun phrase that typically acts as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes the capacity or skills someone or something has to control, manage, or govern something else. Ludwig AI confirms this usage, showing varied contexts where the phrase is applied.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

27%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "abilities to regulate" is a grammatically correct and commonly used noun phrase, denoting the capacity or skills to control or manage something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it frequently appears in science, news media, and formal business contexts, reflecting its versatility and relevance across various domains. When using this phrase, it's best to specify what is being regulated to enhance clarity and avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "capacity to control" or "capability to manage" can be used depending on the specific nuance desired. The phrase's prevalence in authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Guardian underscores its reliability and acceptability in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

capacity to control

Focuses on the potential or power to exert control.

capability to manage

Highlights the competence and skill in handling something.

power to govern

Emphasizes the authority and influence to direct or control.

aptitude for regulating

Suggests a natural talent or inclination towards regulation.

skill in regulating

Highlights expertise and proficiency in the act of regulating.

expertise in controlling

Indicates a high level of specialized knowledge in controlling something.

resources for managing

Emphasizes the availability of means and support for management.

potential for governance

Focuses on the inherent possibility and fitness for governing.

competence in administration

Highlights the ability to effectively administer and oversee.

means of regulating

Refers to the methods or instruments available for regulation.

FAQs

How can I use "abilities to regulate" in a sentence?

You can use "abilities to regulate" to describe the capacity or skills someone or something possesses to control or manage a specific process or system. For instance, "The software enhances the system's "abilities to regulate" data flow efficiently".

What are some alternatives to "abilities to regulate"?

Alternatives include "capacity to control", "capability to manage", or "power to govern", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

Is it more formal to use "abilities to regulate" or "capability to manage"?

"Abilities to regulate" and "capability to manage" are both suitable for formal contexts. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey; "regulate" often implies a more structured or systematic control.

What's the difference between "abilities to regulate" and "skills in controlling"?

"Abilities to regulate" refers to the general capacity to control or manage, while "skills in controlling" emphasizes the expertise and proficiency in performing the act of controlling. The former focuses on potential, while the latter focuses on demonstrated competence.