a valid argument

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a valid argument" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the soundness or logical consistency of a statement or reasoning in a debate, essay, or analysis. Example: "In the context of this debate, I believe that my opponent has presented a valid argument that deserves consideration."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

An inference is monotonic iff adding arbitrary new premises to a valid argument does not affect its validity.

SEP

Yes, that's a valid argument.

The New York Times

Is that a valid argument?

The New York Times

That's a valid argument.

Yale University

He made a valid argument.

The Guardian - Sport

They feel they have a valid argument.

The Guardian

But amid the cliches there is a valid argument.

The Guardian - Opinion

Yeah, I mean, that is also a valid argument.

The New Yorker

3. Which of the following could a valid argument have?

The New York Times

"This is not a valid argument," Nutan responds.

The New Yorker

So it is not a valid argument to use.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a valid argument", ensure that you clearly articulate the premises and conclusion so that the validity of the argument can be easily assessed by the audience.

Common error

Avoid using "a valid argument" when you actually mean a sound argument. A valid argument only requires that the conclusion follows logically from the premises, even if the premises are false. A sound argument, on the other hand, requires both validity and true premises.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a valid argument" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies a specific instance of reasoning or a line of thought that adheres to logical principles. Ludwig examples confirm its common usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Academia

26%

Science

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

14%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a valid argument" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to describe a logically sound line of reasoning. Ludwig confirms its wide usage across news, academia, and science. Remember to distinguish between validity and soundness, and consider alternatives like "a justifiable argument" or "a sound argument" for subtle nuances. Understanding the appropriate context and avoiding common errors will enhance clarity and precision in your writing. Ensure that when you assert something is "a valid argument", it demonstrates clear premises leading to a logical conclusion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a justifiable argument

Focuses more on the defensibility or moral rightness of the argument.

a sound argument

Emphasizes the logical correctness and well-founded nature of the argument.

a well-reasoned argument

Highlights the quality of the reasoning process behind the argument.

a cogent argument

Suggests the argument is clear, logical, and convincing.

a persuasive argument

Focuses on the argument's ability to convince someone of its validity.

a compelling argument

Implies the argument is forceful and difficult to refute.

a legitimate argument

Suggests that the argument is in accordance with accepted rules or standards.

a defensible argument

Highlights the ability to protect the argument against criticism.

a reasonable argument

Emphasizes the argument's rationality and alignment with common sense.

a tenable argument

Implies that the argument can be maintained or defended against attack.

FAQs

How do you identify "a valid argument"?

A valid argument is one where if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Validity focuses on the structure of the argument, not the actual truth of the premises. Look for logical connections between statements.

What's the difference between "a valid argument" and a sound argument?

While "a valid argument" only requires a logical structure, a sound argument needs both validity and true premises. So, a sound argument is always valid, but a valid argument is not always sound. For example, if premises are false but the logic is correct, is still "a valid argument".

What can I say instead of "a valid argument"?

You can use alternatives like "a sound argument", "a well-reasoned argument", or "a cogent argument" depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

When is it appropriate to use the term "a valid argument"?

Use "a valid argument" when discussing the logical structure of an argument, especially in academic, philosophical, or legal contexts. It is suitable when you want to emphasize that the conclusion follows logically from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are actually true.