a union of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a union of" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a combination or coming together of separate elements or entities. Example: The merger between the two companies resulted in a union of resources and expertise.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was always a Union of consent.

Independent

Sport represents almost a union of diversity.

Independent

It's a union of convenience, not emotion".

The New York Times

A union of Sprint and Clearwire had long been expected.

The New York Times

The first is a Union of two, possibly diverging, systems.

The Economist

The constitution declares India a "union of states".

The New York Times

We want a union of the French people against Marxism".

Encyclopedia Britannica

For, etymologically, "Eurasia" might well be a union of opposites.

The New York Times

If so, it was a union of diminishing returns.

The Guardian - Sport

It was a union of the two very different Scotlands.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Perhaps New York's 1.1m schoolchildren need a union of their own.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "a union of" to denote a formal or significant combination of elements, especially when emphasizing the resulting entity or its purpose.

Common error

Avoid using "a union of" when a simpler term like "collection" or "group" suffices. This phrase is more appropriate for significant combinations or formal entities, not casual groupings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a union of" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as a subject complement or object in a sentence. Ludwig AI indicates its correctness and widespread use, as evidenced by numerous examples across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

42%

Encyclopedias

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a union of" is a versatile and commonly used expression that signifies a combination, merger, or alliance, as validated by Ludwig AI. It is grammatically correct and appears frequently in diverse contexts such as news, science, and encyclopedias. While similar phrases like "a combination of" or "a merger of" can be used, "a union of" often implies a more formal and significant joining. When writing, use this phrase to accurately depict the merging of entities, but avoid overusing it in simple aggregations. By understanding its nuances, writers can effectively use "a union of" to enhance clarity and precision in their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a combination of

Emphasizes the blending of different parts or qualities into a single entity.

a merger of

Specifically suggests the combining of two or more entities into one.

an alliance of

Highlights a formal agreement or partnership between groups or entities.

a coalition of

Implies a temporary grouping of different factions for a specific purpose.

a federation of

Suggests a political or structural joining of entities while maintaining some autonomy.

an amalgamation of

Focuses on the process of merging different substances or elements together.

a synthesis of

Highlights the creation of something new by combining different ideas or elements.

a blend of

Indicates a smooth and harmonious mixture of different elements.

a network of

Describes a connected system or group of related items or individuals.

an association of

Implies a formal group of people or organizations with a common interest.

FAQs

How can I use "a union of" in a sentence?

Use "a union of" to describe the combination or joining of multiple entities or concepts. For example: "The project was "a union of" art and technology."

What are some alternatives to "a union of"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "a combination of", "a merger of", or "an alliance of".

When is it appropriate to use "a union of"?

It's appropriate to use "a union of" when you want to emphasize the joining together of distinct entities to form a new or stronger whole. This phrase is common in political, economic, and social contexts.

What's the difference between "a union of" and "a group of"?

"A union of" suggests a more structured and purposeful combination, often with a formal agreement or shared goal. "A group of" is a more general term for any collection of items or people.