Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a systematic meltdown of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a systematic meltdown of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a structured or organized failure or collapse of a system, process, or organization. Example: "The company experienced a systematic meltdown of its operational procedures, leading to significant losses."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
One trader told the Financial Times that there was no panic in the markets, only "a systematic meltdown of testing new bottoms".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
"Clearly, there was a systematic failure of oversight".
News & Media
A systematic review of acupuncture antiemesis trials.
News & Media
A systematic review of recent epidemiologic evidence.
News & Media
The room precipitates a visual meltdown of practically Byzantine glory.
News & Media
A partial meltdown of the core also occurred.
Encyclopedias
A full meltdown of the fuel rods would be catastrophic, releasing great amounts of radiation.
News & Media
Come summer the capital will be experiencing a business meltdown of its own.
News & Media
It happened in a dangerously constructed nuclear power reactor with a total meltdown of the core and 10 days of free emission of radionuclides into the atmosphere.
Science
This was a meltdown of simply unimaginable proportions.
News & Media
Miami may or may not be suffering a meltdown of its own accord.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "a systematic meltdown of", ensure the context clearly indicates a structured or organized failure. Provide specific details about the system or process undergoing the meltdown to enhance clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "a systematic meltdown of" when describing purely accidental or random events. This phrase implies a level of structure or planning, even if the outcome is negative.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a systematic meltdown of" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as a subject or object in a sentence. It describes a structured or organized failure, emphasizing the methodical nature of the breakdown. Ludwig indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
25%
Wiki
12.5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
12.5%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "a systematic meltdown of" describes a structured failure, implying that a process or system has broken down in an organized way. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable. While its usage is infrequent, it appears primarily in news and media contexts. Alternative phrases, such as "a structured collapse of" or "a methodical breakdown of", offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances. When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly reflects a structured failure to avoid misattributing intentionality.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a structured collapse of
Replaces "meltdown" with "collapse", emphasizing a structural failure.
a methodical breakdown of
Substitutes "systematic" with "methodical" and "meltdown" with "breakdown", focusing on a step-by-step failure.
a planned disintegration of
Replaces "meltdown" with "disintegration", suggesting a more complete loss of structure, and "systematic" with "planned".
a calculated failure of
Substitutes "systematic" with "calculated" to imply intentionality, and replaces "meltdown" with "failure".
an orchestrated downfall of
Replaces "systematic" with "orchestrated" to give a sense of careful coordination, and replaces "meltdown" with "downfall".
a strategic disintegration of
Emphasizes a deliberate and planned failure or collapse.
an organized disintegration of
Focuses on the deliberate nature of the breakdown, replacing "meltdown" with a stronger term.
a step-by-step collapse of
Highlights the incremental nature of the failure, suggesting a gradual process.
a gradual disintegration of
Implies a slow and progressive decline or breakdown.
a phased failure of
Suggests that the failure occurred in stages or phases.
FAQs
How can I use "a systematic meltdown of" in a sentence?
You can use "a systematic meltdown of" to describe a structured failure, as in "The company experienced "a systematic meltdown of" its operational procedures".
What's a good alternative to "a systematic meltdown of"?
Alternatives include "a structured collapse of" or "a methodical breakdown of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is "a systematic meltdown of" the same as "a complete failure of"?
While both describe negative outcomes, "a systematic meltdown of" implies a structured process leading to failure, whereas "a complete failure of" simply indicates total lack of success without necessarily implying structure.
When is it appropriate to use "a systematic meltdown of"?
Use "a systematic meltdown of" when describing the organized or structured failure of a process, system, or organization. It's less appropriate for describing random or accidental failures.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested