a substantial violation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a substantial violation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, formal, or academic contexts to refer to a significant breach of rules, laws, or agreements. Example: "The company faced severe penalties due to a substantial violation of environmental regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

Between those two cases, however, are a wide range of differences on what type of alteration constitutes a substantial violation of the lease and what doesn't.

The New York Times

Many alterations, even those that may constitute a substantial violation of the no-alteration clause, can ultimately be cured by the tenant.

The New York Times

For example, Ms. McGuire said, in a 1997 Manhattan case, an appeals court ruled that a tenant who had replaced all kitchen and bathroom appliances had committed a substantial violation of the lease and could be evicted.

The New York Times

The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a timely investigation of a nonfrivolous written complaint alleging that a substantial violation of a regulation prescribed under this subchapter is occurring or has occurred within the prior 60 days.

Cornell University

A Peter Schwartz, a Manhattan landlord-tenant lawyer, said that even though the lease provides that the apartment may be used for residential purposes only, it is unlikely that a court would consider the use of the apartment as a home office as a substantial violation of the lease.

The New York Times

The basis for this termination is a substantial violation defined by statue and/or your Lease.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Routine diagnostic tests did not detect any substantial violation of underlying assumptions of the Cox regression.

Environmental Health Perspectives

From the evidence that has been made public, "there appeared to be a prima facie case of a conspiracy to violate, and substantial violation of the revolving door statute," said Stanley Brand, a Washington lawyer who specializes in defending clients investigated by the government.

The New York Times

Precisely this result has been utilized by many studies mentioned above-in particular by [2, 3, 5, 8]-in order to derive experimental designs from the preference reversal literature where substantial violation rates of transitivity have been observed.

Health Economics Review

Indeed, the Constitution and federal statutes have already "federalized" numerous matters relating to the appointment of presidential electors, including those at issue here.... Contrary to the F.D.P.'s assertions, this case involves much more than a "state law dispute," and instead involves substantial violations of due process and Title 3, United States Code, Section 5.

The New York Times

We must model a world where people display multiple and substantial violations of the rationality assumptions of microeconomic theoryIn my view, economists have failed to take enough account of the impact of financial markets, perhaps because, until the 1980s, these markets seemed relatively unimportant.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a substantial violation", ensure the context clearly establishes what specific rule, law, or agreement has been breached to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "a substantial violation" for minor or trivial infractions. Reserve it for cases where the breach is genuinely significant and has considerable consequences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a substantial violation" functions as a noun phrase, where "substantial" modifies "violation". It commonly serves as the object of a verb, describing the nature of an infraction or breach, as illustrated in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

29%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

14%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a substantial violation" is a phrase used to describe a significant breach of a rule, law, or agreement. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and suitability for formal contexts such as legal, academic, and news reporting. While not extremely frequent, it is a useful expression when the severity of the violation needs to be emphasized. When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly identifies the rule that has been violated and that the violation is, in fact, significant. Alternatives like "a significant breach" or "a major infringement" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a material violation

Highlights that the violation is relevant and consequential to the matter at hand, especially in a legal context.

a significant breach

Focuses on the act of breaking a rule or agreement, rather than the magnitude of the violation itself.

a major infringement

Emphasizes the act of transgressing or overstepping boundaries.

a serious transgression

Highlights the gravity and moral implications of the violation.

a gross violation

Highlights a stark and unacceptable disregard for standards of behavior or moral principles.

a flagrant violation

Suggests that the violation is blatant and obvious.

a grievous breach

Emphasizes the harm or damage caused by the violation.

a critical infraction

Points out a violation that has significant consequences or repercussions.

a notable infringement

Highlights the prominent or remarkable nature of the violation.

a severe contravention

Indicates a strong and serious opposition to a law or regulation.

FAQs

How can I use "a substantial violation" in a sentence?

You can use "a substantial violation" to describe a significant breach of a rule, law, or agreement. For example, "The company faced penalties due to "a substantial violation" of environmental regulations".

What's the difference between "a substantial violation" and "a minor infraction"?

"A substantial violation" refers to a significant breach with notable consequences, while "a minor infraction" indicates a less serious offense with minimal impact. The choice depends on the gravity of the situation.

Which is correct, "substantial violation" or "significant violation"?

Both "substantial violation" and "significant violation" are correct and can be used interchangeably. However, "substantial violation" may imply a slightly larger degree of impact or consequence.

What can I say instead of "a substantial violation"?

You can use alternatives like "a significant breach", "a major infringement", or "a serious transgression" depending on the specific context.