Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a substantial inaccuracy
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a substantial inaccuracy" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a significant error or discrepancy in information or data. Example: "The report contained a substantial inaccuracy that affected the overall conclusions drawn from the research."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
I am not sure this counts as a substantial inaccuracy but an after-dinner speech does gives the impression of something prepared beforehand, that was more thoughtful and considered, rather than an off-the-cuff joke now publicly regretted by Prof Hunt as being thoughtless.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
There are serious questions about the accuracy of the interviewees' memory, and the ICRP concluded "…there may be substantial inaccuracy in reporting, and there is a suggestion in the OSCC study that differential recall of x-ray procedures could have biased the results", and "…only 66% of reported prenatal x rays were actually confirmed" (ICRP 2003a).
Science
The computational gene prediction methods produce protein sequence sets that represent the theoretical proteome of Toxoplasma gondii; however, the datasets of predicted protein sequences are quite different and are likely to introduce substantial inaccuracy [10] [12].
Science
If, for example, we look only at the 876 datasets that contain some inconsistency in the reporting of number of sex acts, then it is clear that there is substantial inaccuracy in the other methods as well: 68% of the CRFs, 53% of the coital diaries and 30% of the in-depth interviews were inaccurate when compared to the triangulated data.
Science
Where quantitative data is available it generally suggests substantial inaccuracy.
Science
A number of studies have found, however, that both family members and care professional show substantial inaccuracy in attempting to predict patients' life-sustaining treatment preferences [ 15- 17].
Science
Even so, the extreme concentration of estimates at the edges of the sample space might not hold up with the inclusion of more than three markers (see below), or if there is substantial inaccuracy in the estimates of parental allele frequencies.
Science
It is understood that the assumption of constant unit costs may result in substantial inaccuracies [ 19].
Science
Substantial inaccuracies in administrative data are common, which leads to expensive data extraction and difficulty in validating data [ 1- 3].
Science
There is, however, a substantial degree of inaccuracy in the recorded ethnicity of patients who self-report themselves as belonging to ethnic minority groups.
Science
However, frequent recalibration is time-consuming, might result in inaccuracies itself and in a substantial fluid-load.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "a substantial inaccuracy" when you want to emphasize the significant degree of error or deviation from the truth. It is suitable for formal writing where precision is important.
Common error
Avoid using "a substantial inaccuracy" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler terms like "big mistake" or "major error" are more appropriate.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a substantial inaccuracy" functions as a noun phrase, specifically an abstract noun, that describes a notable error. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, highlighting that it refers to a significant error or discrepancy.
Frequent in
Science
45%
News & Media
45%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "a substantial inaccuracy" is a noun phrase used to describe a significant error or deviation from the truth. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in formal written English. It is most commonly found in scientific and news contexts, indicating a need for precision and accuracy. While alternatives like "significant error" or "major mistake" exist, "a substantial inaccuracy" provides a specific emphasis on the magnitude of the error, making it a valuable phrase in contexts where clear and accurate communication is paramount.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a significant error
Focuses on the error being important or noteworthy.
a major mistake
Emphasizes the magnitude and impact of the error.
a gross misrepresentation
Highlights the distortion of facts or information.
a serious distortion
Implies a severe alteration or twisting of the truth.
a considerable deviation
Suggests a significant departure from the correct or expected value.
a marked discrepancy
Points out a notable difference or inconsistency.
a glaring falsehood
Highlights an obvious and easily detectable untruth.
a fundamental flaw
Indicates a basic or essential defect in something.
a critical lapse
Suggests a failure or omission that has serious consequences.
a notable untruth
Emphasizes that the lack of truth is important.
FAQs
How can I use "a substantial inaccuracy" in a sentence?
You can use "a substantial inaccuracy" to highlight a significant error or deviation in data, reports, or statements. For instance, "The audit revealed "a substantial inaccuracy" in the financial records".
What are some alternatives to "a substantial inaccuracy"?
Alternatives include "a significant error", "a major mistake", or "a gross misrepresentation", depending on the specific context and the nature of the inaccuracy.
Is it better to say "substantial inaccuracy" or "significant inaccuracy"?
Both "substantial inaccuracy" and "significant inaccuracy" are correct and largely interchangeable. "Substantial" emphasizes the amount or size of the inaccuracy, while "significant" emphasizes its importance or consequence. Choose the word that best fits the specific context.
What's the difference between "a substantial inaccuracy" and "a slight inaccuracy"?
"A substantial inaccuracy" refers to a significant and impactful error, while "a slight inaccuracy" refers to a minor or trivial error. The choice depends on the magnitude and consequence of the mistake.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested