a subsequence of with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a subsequence of with" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It appears to be a fragment that lacks clarity and context, making it unusable as it stands. Example: "The subsequence of the series with the highest values is crucial for analysis."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Let be a subsequence of with and let.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Then is a subsequence of with for every.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Let be a subsequence of with and let be a sequence in and such that and.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

If is a bounded sequence in a complete CAT (0)space with and is a subsequence of with and the sequence converges, then.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Suppose there exists and a sequence with and in such that for every there exists a subsequence of with in as in.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Now (2.10) with guarantees that there exists a subsequence of and a with in as in.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

Since is bounded in, there exist a subsequence of and with and on, such that (3.10).

Boundary Value Problems

Figures 7 and 8 present a subsequence of frames with visualisation of tracking results from the original CEM tracker and our proposed constrained tracking algorithm, respectively.

IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications

A low frequency non-dominant fragment of C is a subsequence of C with significantly lower coverage (a pre-specified value) compared to flanking regions.

BMC Genomics

If {x n } is a bounded sequence in a CAT 0) space X with A({x n }) = {x} and {u n } is a subsequence of {u n } with A({u n }) = {u} and the sequence {d(x n, u)} converges, then x = u.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

There are three methods to find the n-mismatch genome positions of a subsequence of length l with the hash table.

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a subsequence, clarify its relationship to the original sequence using phrases like "derived from", "extracted from", or "taken from" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "a subsequence of with" as it is grammatically incorrect. Ensure that the preposition 'of' is followed by a noun phrase that clearly indicates the source sequence. For example, "a subsequence of the original data" is correct.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a subsequence of with" attempts to specify a portion of a sequence but fails to do so grammatically. As Ludwig AI points out, this construction is not correct in written English. A proper noun or a definite article is needed instead of 'with'.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a subsequence of with" is grammatically flawed and should be avoided in formal writing. While Ludwig AI shows its presence in some scientific literature, it is not considered correct English. To convey the intended meaning of identifying a portion of a sequence, it is best to use alternatives such as "a subsequence derived from", "a subsequence extracted from", or other grammatically sound constructions. Remember to ensure that the preposition 'of' is followed by a clear noun phrase that specifies the source sequence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a subsequence derived from

This alternative replaces "of with" to indicate the origin of the subsequence.

a subsequence extracted from

This alternative emphasizes the action of taking out a subsequence from a larger sequence.

a subsequence taken from

This option uses "taken from" to specify the origin of the subsequence.

a part of with

This simplification uses "part of" to convey the idea of subsequence, but might lose the sequential context.

a subset of with

This phrase changes "subsequence" to the more general term "subset," which may or may not preserve the order.

a section of with

This changes subsequence to a less math-heavy phrasing.

a segment of with

This alternative replaces "subsequence" with "segment" while still preserving the order.

a fragment of with

This option substitutes "subsequence" with "fragment," suggesting a smaller, possibly incomplete, part.

a portion of with

This rephrases "subsequence" using "portion" to indicate a part or share.

a piece of with

This replaces "subsequence" with "piece," a general term for a part of something.

FAQs

How can I correctly refer to a subsequence?

To correctly refer to a subsequence, use phrases like "a subsequence derived from", "a subsequence extracted from", or "a subsequence taken from". For example, instead of saying "a subsequence of with", say "a subsequence derived from the main sequence".

What phrases can I use instead of "a subsequence of with"?

Alternatives to "a subsequence of with" include "a subsequence derived from", "a subsequence extracted from", or "a segment of", depending on the desired level of specificity.

Is "a subsequence of with" grammatically correct?

No, "a subsequence of with" is not grammatically correct. The preposition 'of' should be followed by a noun phrase specifying the source sequence, such as "a subsequence of the original sequence".

How does the term subsequence relate to sequence?

A subsequence is a sequence that can be derived from another sequence by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements. Using correct phrasing such as "a subsequence derived from" helps clarify this relationship.