a striking dearth of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a striking dearth of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to emphasize a significant lack or absence of something, often in a formal or literary context. Example: "The report revealed a striking dearth of evidence to support the claims made by the witnesses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

There is a striking dearth of ideas about what to do.

The New Yorker

For a country that likes to brag about its 5,000-year-old 5,000-year-old 5,000-year-oldtriking dearth of any propaganda-free programming that civilisationt.

The Economist

In particular, there is a striking dearth of data on intrinsic or biological risk factors for BV.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Secondly, the overwhelming majority of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with disease lie in intra- or intergenic regions; there has been a striking dearth of coding SNPs.

Genome Medicine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Instead he points to his discovery of a striking dearth in reliable peer-reviewed data on what it costs to generate renewable electricity and what determines those costs.

The Economist

Last month at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston, team member Clark Chapman of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, argued that the striking dearth of meteorite craters on some parts of Europa implies that such reshaping of the surface is still happening.

Science Magazine

In this editorial, we outline the importance of such organizational-level turnover rate research and note the striking dearth and major omission of this type of research in the Chinese context, and outline a call for contextual and industry studies in China to fill the gap.

Frontiers of Business Research in China

With a dearth of striking options and the opening fixture of the Premiership season looming, Glenn Roeder is stepping up his pursuit of potential targets.

The Guardian - Sport

Chief among them was: why had the European champions of 2008, the beaten finalists of 2009, been left with such a dearth of striking options when it came to the business end of this season's competition?

Independent

This is a striking bit of illogic.

The New York Times

A dangerous dearth of respect in society?

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "a striking dearth of" to emphasize a significant and often surprising lack of something, particularly in formal or analytical writing.

Common error

Avoid using "a striking dearth of" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler phrases like "a noticeable lack of" or "not enough" are often more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a striking dearth of" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject complement or within a prepositional phrase. It emphasizes the significant absence or lack of something. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a striking dearth of" is a noun phrase used to emphasize a significant lack or absence of something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in formal contexts. The phrase is most commonly found in news and scientific writing. When writing, remember that while grammatically sound, it is best suited for formal writing and analytical reports, avoiding overuse in casual contexts. Related alternatives include "a remarkable scarcity of" and "a noticeable absence of", offering similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a remarkable scarcity of

Replaces 'dearth' with 'scarcity', emphasizing limited availability; 'remarkable' highlights the noteworthiness of the scarcity, similar to 'striking'.

a noticeable absence of

Uses 'absence' instead of 'dearth', making it more straightforward and less formal. 'Noticeable' is a more common synonym for 'striking'.

a considerable lack of

Substitutes 'dearth' with 'lack', reducing formality. 'Considerable' emphasizes the significance of the lack.

a marked deficiency in

Replaces 'dearth' with 'deficiency', indicating an inadequacy. 'Marked' highlights the clear presence of the deficiency, mirroring 'striking'.

a prominent shortage of

Uses 'shortage' in place of 'dearth', focusing on a deficit. 'Prominent' underscores the visibility of the shortage.

a glaring inadequacy of

Replaces 'dearth' with 'inadequacy', suggesting something is insufficient. 'Glaring' stresses the obvious nature of the inadequacy.

a palpable deficit of

Uses 'deficit' instead of 'dearth', indicating a shortfall. 'Palpable' emphasizes the ease with which the deficit can be perceived.

a conspicuous insufficiency of

Replaces 'dearth' with 'insufficiency', focusing on inadequacy. 'Conspicuous' makes the lack easily noticeable.

a severe paucity of

Employs 'paucity' instead of 'dearth', retaining a formal tone. 'Severe' intensifies the sense of lack.

a critical void of

Replaces 'dearth' with 'void', highlighting emptiness or absence. 'Critical' emphasizes the importance of what is missing.

FAQs

How can I use "a striking dearth of" in a sentence?

You can use "a striking dearth of" to emphasize a significant lack of something. For example, "There is "a striking dearth of" reliable data on the subject."

What's a simpler way to say "a striking dearth of"?

Alternatives include "a noticeable lack of", "a significant absence of", or simply "not enough" depending on the context.

Is "dearth" the same as "death"?

"Dearth" means a scarcity or lack of something, while "death" refers to the end of life. They are not related.

What are some contexts where "a striking dearth of" is appropriate?

This phrase is suitable for formal writing, analytical reports, and academic papers where you want to emphasize a significant lack of something. It's less appropriate for casual conversation.