a stream of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a stream of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a continuous flow of something. For example: "The children watched in amazement as a stream of bubbles flowed from the machine."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

A stream of banter lubricated their play.

The New York Times

A stream of eggs was laid.

The New Yorker

Soon, there's a stream of visitors.

The Guardian

It'll just be a stream of consciousness.

The Guardian - Sport

There followed a stream of yeses.

The Guardian - Books

It's more like a stream of water".

The New York Times

That opened a stream of questions.

The New York Times

But there is also a stream of corruption.

The New Yorker

Doctors, nurses and a stream of technicians crowded the room.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

His answer had a stream-of-consciousness quality to it.

The New Yorker

It's a stream-of-consciousness narrative, almost Joycean.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "a stream of" to describe a continuous or steady flow of items, ideas, or events. It adds a sense of ongoing movement or progression to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "a stream of" to describe collections of static or unrelated objects. It is best suited for describing things that naturally flow or occur in sequence, rather than a random assortment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a stream of" functions as a determiner followed by a noun, modifying the noun to indicate a continuous or steady flow or series. Ludwig examples show it preceding various nouns, such as "visitors", "consciousness", and "accusations". According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Science

26%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a stream of" is a versatile phrase used to describe a continuous flow or series of something, as supported by Ludwig's examples from numerous sources. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically sound and usable in various contexts. It's most commonly found in news and media and scientific writing, and it carries a neutral register, making it suitable for diverse audiences. Alternatives like "a series of" or "a flow of" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Be mindful to use it with entities that can logically flow or occur in sequence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a continuous flow of

Emphasizes the uninterrupted nature of the flow, similar to the original phrase.

a flood of

Implies a large and sudden influx.

a wave of

Indicates a surge or sudden increase in something.

a torrent of

Suggests a forceful and rapid flow.

a constant barrage of

Highlights an overwhelming or intense series of events or items.

an outpouring of

Implies a strong and often emotional release.

a cascade of

Implies a falling or flowing arrangement, often used metaphorically.

a steady procession of

Suggests an ordered and deliberate sequence.

a succession of

Similar to a series, but often implies a chronological order.

a series of

A more general term for a sequence of things.

FAQs

How can I use "a stream of" in a sentence?

Use "a stream of" to describe a continuous flow or series of something. For example, "a stream of visitors" or "a stream of consciousness".

What are some alternatives to "a stream of"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "a series of", "a flow of", or "an outpouring of".

Is it correct to say "a stream of information"?

Yes, it is correct. "A stream of information" is a common and accepted way to describe a continuous flow of data or news.

What's the difference between "a stream of" and "a flood of"?

"A stream of" implies a steady, continuous flow, while "a flood of" suggests a sudden, overwhelming influx.