a split history

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a split history" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a historical narrative that is divided or has contrasting elements, often referring to different perspectives or events. Example: "The book presents a split history of the region, highlighting both the indigenous and colonial viewpoints."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The company’s website shows a split history.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

"In just a split second history could turn left or right or up or down".

The New York Times - Sports

Also, instead of Confederate's faux-history about a split United States where slavery still lives on, Black America is set in a world where freed African Americans were given a trio of Southern states after the Civil War as reparations.

Vice

It would be the fifth time in the nation's history that such a split has occurred and may be a boon to advocates of reform of the two-century-old system.

The Guardian

José Pékerman was unveiled as Colombia manager at the start of 2012 in a decision that split the history of the team in two.

The Guardian - Sport

Just a split second".

The New York Times - Sports

A split second passed.

The New York Times

Remove a split.

WikiHow

Qureshi studied the split in history classes as a child, but neither player said the conflict had influenced his thinking.

The New York Times - Sports

Moreover, these analyses pinpoint a deep split in the history of the duplications: the class I B region of macaques comprises a telomeric region where B genes are mostly expressed and associated with MIBs as well as a centromeric region where B genes are mostly pseudogenes and not associated with MIBs.

BMC Genomics

For practical reasons, the inoculation was spread over four days, with the replicate lineages within an evolutionary history split between the days.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a split history", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being divided, such as political ideologies, cultural perspectives, or historical narratives.

Common error

Avoid using "a split history" when a more nuanced term like "complex history" or "multifaceted history" would better represent the situation, especially when dealing with intricate social or political developments.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a split history" functions as a noun phrase, where "split" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "history". It describes the nature or characteristic of the history being referred to. Ludwig AI confirms that is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a split history" is a grammatically sound way to describe a past marked by division or divergence, as supported by Ludwig. Though relatively rare, the expression finds use in diverse contexts, ranging from news reports to scientific discussions. The phrase is most appropriate when highlighting contrasting elements or significant turning points within a historical narrative. When considering its use, be mindful of potential oversimplification, opting for more nuanced terms like "complex history" or "multifaceted history" if the situation warrants. Ludwig shows that various sources from different expertise areas consider the term as valid.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a divided past

Emphasizes the separation and lack of unity in historical events.

a fractured narrative

Highlights the broken or fragmented nature of the historical account.

a history of discord

Focuses on the presence of conflict and disagreement throughout history.

a bifurcated timeline

Implies a clear split into two distinct paths or periods.

a contested history

Suggests that there are competing interpretations or disputes over the historical events.

a history marked by schism

Emphasizes the presence of formal divisions or separations.

a past of fragmentation

Focuses on the process of breaking apart or disintegrating.

a history in two parts

A more literal description of a history divided into two distinct segments.

a dual historical record

Highlights the existence of two separate and potentially conflicting historical accounts.

a history of diverging paths

Indicates a history where different groups or elements followed separate and distinct trajectories.

FAQs

How can I use "a split history" in a sentence?

You can use "a split history" to describe a past characterized by division or divergence. For example: "The region has "a split history" due to differing colonial influences".

What is the difference between "a split history" and "a complex history"?

"A split history" implies a clear division or divergence, while "a complex history" suggests multiple interwoven factors and perspectives. The former emphasizes separation; the latter, intricacy.

Are there situations where "a split history" would not be appropriate?

Yes, if the historical narrative is more nuanced and interconnected than simply divided, terms like "a complex history" or "a multifaceted history" might be more suitable.

What are some synonyms for "a split history"?

Alternatives include "a divided past", "a fractured narrative", or "a history of discord", depending on the specific emphasis you want to convey.