a sound hypothesis

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a sound hypothesis" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a hypothesis that is well-founded, logical, and based on solid reasoning or evidence. Example: "After reviewing the data, we concluded that a sound hypothesis would be that increased exercise leads to improved mental health."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Conclusive answers are not available yet, but a sound hypothesis can be put forward.

Aging

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The cell-graph methodology represents each cell with a vertex (node) and establishes a link between a pair of nodes if there is a biologically sound hypothesis that the pair communicates with each other through chemical signals, ECM etc.

Plosone

Neural net equations have been determined on the basis of a sound theoretical hypothesis of bactericidal activity, 29 experimental measures, carefully chosen molecular parameters, and the development of a predictive model based on these aspects.

Creative Evolutionary Systems

Since it would be the most efficient arrangement, such pathway "optimization" makes for a sound starting hypothesis, but nature "rarely reinvents the wheel" and we can expect enzymes to be opportunistically co-opted (or "recruited") for new metabolic tasks so long as they are good enough for the job.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

However, a sound phylogenetic hypothesis of a taxon is the prerequisite to reconstruct evolutionary changes in the group of interest.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Of course, our scenario for Clonopsis deserves more in-depth analyses to be tried, nevertheless we feel that this is a sound "working hypothesis".

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Our micro-evolutionary scenario for Clonopsis needs more in-depth analyses to be tried out, nevertheless we feel that this is a sound "working hypothesis" that merits further study.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

But the purpose of validating a model's predictions is entirely different from our purpose of conducting sound hypothesis testing.

European Journal of Epidemiology

Sound hypothesis says that it protects brain during hypoxia.

Biosystems

Sound hypotheses must drive the rationale for using individual data or aggregated future teacher data as surrogates for program-level constructs in order to derive correlation coefficients.

Large-scale Assessments in Education

We recommend using decision frameworks to design breeding plans for schemes that use genomic information: testing sound hypotheses by designing and executing controlled experiments using decision tools, such as mathematical statistical models.

Livestock Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "a sound hypothesis", ensure you can articulate the reasoning and evidence that supports it. Clearly outline the logical steps that connect your evidence to your proposed explanation.

Common error

Avoid presenting a hypothesis as "a sound hypothesis" if the supporting evidence is weak or preliminary. Overstating the case can undermine your credibility. Instead, qualify your statement by acknowledging the limitations of the evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a sound hypothesis" functions primarily as a noun phrase, acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes a specific type of hypothesis, one that is well-reasoned and supported by evidence. As Ludwig AI clarifies, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a sound hypothesis" is a valuable phrase for academic and scientific writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and effective for presenting well-supported explanations. Remember to use this phrase when your hypothesis is based on solid reasoning and credible evidence. While alternatives like ""a well-founded hypothesis"" or ""a solid hypothesis"" exist, the key is to ensure the phrase accurately reflects the strength of the evidence supporting your claim. Be mindful of overstating your case and clearly articulate the logical steps that connect your evidence to your proposed explanation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a well-founded hypothesis

Emphasizes the strong foundation or basis of the hypothesis.

a solid hypothesis

Highlights the robustness and reliability of the hypothesis.

a valid hypothesis

Focuses on the legitimacy and correctness of the hypothesis.

a plausible hypothesis

Suggests that the hypothesis is believable and likely to be true.

a tenable hypothesis

Indicates that the hypothesis is defensible and can be maintained against objections.

a reasonable hypothesis

Implies that the hypothesis is logical and based on good judgment.

a credible hypothesis

Highlights the trustworthiness and believability of the hypothesis.

a robust hypothesis

Emphasizes the ability of the hypothesis to withstand scrutiny and testing.

a defensible hypothesis

Indicates that the hypothesis can be supported with evidence and reasoning.

a supportable hypothesis

Focuses on the availability of evidence to back up the hypothesis.

FAQs

How can I use "a sound hypothesis" in a sentence?

You can use "a sound hypothesis" to introduce a well-supported explanation for a phenomenon. For example: "After analyzing the experimental data, we developed "a sound hypothesis" about the mechanism of action."

What is an alternative to saying "a sound hypothesis"?

Alternatives to "a sound hypothesis" include "a well-founded hypothesis", "a solid hypothesis", or "a valid hypothesis". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "sound hypothesis" or "well-supported hypothesis"?

Both "sound hypothesis" and "well-supported hypothesis" are acceptable. "Sound hypothesis" emphasizes the logical coherence and reasoning behind the hypothesis, while "well-supported hypothesis" highlights the empirical evidence backing it. The choice depends on the aspect you want to emphasize.

What makes a hypothesis "sound"?

A hypothesis is considered "sound" when it is based on solid reasoning, logical principles, and credible evidence. It should also be internally consistent and align with existing knowledge in the field.