a series of conflicts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a series of conflicts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe multiple disputes or disagreements that occur in succession or are related in some way. Example: "The region has experienced a series of conflicts over the past decade, leading to significant humanitarian issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

He subsequently embroiled Serbia in a series of conflicts with the successor Balkan states.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The Haitian Revolution was a series of conflicts that took place between 1791 and 1804.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Against this background arose a revolution, beginning as a series of conflicts from the early 1790s.

Britannica

The scanner software created a series of conflicts with other software on her computer.

The New York Times

(3) A series of conflicts between England and France, from 1337 to 1453.

The Guardian

What occurred that evening and in the following days was a series of conflicts primarily between servicemen and zoot-suiters.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The flotilla crisis last year followed a series of conflicts that had soured relations between the two countries.

The New York Times

America is the main arbiter in a series of conflicts, either actual or potential, in a wide arc stretching from the Adriatic to the Caspian Sea.

The Economist

Mobutu was ousted in 1997, at the beginning of a series of conflicts with neighboring states that have raged intermittently for two decades, devastating millions of lives.

The New Yorker

Since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, in 1979, Swat has seen a series of conflicts among governments, Islamic radicals, and local residents.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Tom Winslow gave a series of conflicting statements before concluding that he was not involved.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a series of conflicts", ensure that the conflicts are related by a common theme, cause, or involved parties to maintain clarity and coherence in your writing. For instance, "The economic crisis triggered a series of conflicts between labor unions and management."

Common error

Avoid using "a series of conflicts" to describe unrelated or coincidental disagreements. The phrase implies a connected sequence, not just a random assortment of disputes. For example, stating "The company faced a series of conflicts: a lawsuit, a product recall, and a labor strike" is less effective if these events are entirely unconnected.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a series of conflicts" functions primarily as a noun phrase, acting as the subject, object, or complement in a sentence. As Ludwig AI suggests, it describes multiple related disputes or disagreements. Ludwig provides numerous examples from encyclopedias, news media, and other sources demonstrating its versatility.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Encyclopedias

26%

Wiki

22%

Less common in

Science

7%

Formal & Business

2%

Academia

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a series of conflicts" is a versatile and commonly used phrase for describing multiple related disputes. Grammatically correct and widely accepted, as Ludwig AI confirms, it appears frequently in diverse contexts, including news, encyclopedias, and academic writing. While alternatives like "a chain of confrontations" or "a succession of hostilities" offer subtle variations in meaning, the core concept remains consistent: a sequence of interconnected disagreements. When employing this phrase, ensure that the conflicts share a common link to maintain clarity and avoid misrepresenting unrelated events.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a chain of confrontations

Replaces "conflicts" with "confrontations", suggesting a more direct and potentially aggressive sequence of events. "Chain" implies a linear connection.

a succession of hostilities

Replaces "series" with "succession", emphasizing the sequential nature of the events. "Hostilities" suggests open acts of war or aggression.

an outbreak of disputes

Shifts the focus to the sudden emergence of multiple disagreements, rather than their ongoing nature.

a wave of clashes

Uses "wave" to convey a sense of increasing intensity or widespread occurrence of clashes.

a cycle of battles

Highlights the recurring or cyclical nature of the conflicts, implying a pattern of repeated engagements.

a string of altercations

Emphasizes individual instances of heated disagreement or confrontation that are linked together.

a pattern of struggles

Focuses on the identifiable pattern or trend emerging from the conflicts, rather than the conflicts themselves.

a history of wars

Specifies that conflicts are wars rather than disagreements.

multiple frictions

Suggests underlying tensions and disagreements rather than outright conflicts, implying a more subtle level of discord.

escalating tensions

Focuses on the increasing intensity of the disagreements, suggesting a progression towards more serious conflicts.

FAQs

How can I use "a series of conflicts" in a sentence?

You can use "a series of conflicts" to describe multiple related disputes or disagreements. For example, "The treaty violations led to "a series of conflicts" between the neighboring countries."

What are some alternatives to "a series of conflicts"?

Alternatives include "a chain of confrontations", "a succession of hostilities", or "an outbreak of disputes", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to use "a series of conflict" instead of "a series of conflicts"?

No, the correct phrase is "a series of conflicts". "Conflicts" is plural because "series" implies multiple events or items. Using the singular form "conflict" would be grammatically incorrect in this context.

What's the difference between "a series of conflicts" and "escalating tensions"?

"A series of conflicts" refers to distinct, identifiable clashes or disputes, while "escalating tensions" describes a growing sense of strain and unease that may or may not lead to open conflicts. The former is more concrete, while the latter is more abstract.