Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a sample of participants
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a sample of participants" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a selected group of individuals chosen for a study, survey, or research project. Example: "In our study, we collected data from a sample of participants to analyze their responses to the survey questions."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(14)
a selection of individuals
a subset of people
a cohort of participants
a group of participants
a selection of participants
a sample of representatives
a sample of applicants
a sample of patients
a sample of respondents
a number of applicants
a selected number of participants
a subset of participants
a few participants
some participants
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Qualitative telephone interviews will be embedded in the research design to obtain feedback from a sample of participants' about their experiences of sleep monitoring, trial participation and interventions, and to inform the design of a fully powered future RCT.
A sample of participants from each group will be invited to participate in a semistructured telephone interview or to attend a focus group (one per intervention) at the end of the 6 month follow-up.
In addition, subjects needed only to be patients of CARD with documented exposure to LAA to participate in the study resulting in a sample of participants at varying stages of health and illness.
Science
8 We tested the effectiveness of a decision aid in facilitating understanding, involvement, and informed choice about participation in screening for bowel cancer among a sample of participants with low education.
Science
The first aim was to examine the relationships between perfectionism dimensions [ 13, 18] and pathological worry in a sample of participants with elevated perfectionism and GAD (n = 36) who were participating in a perfectionism treatment trial.
Science
Thus, the aim of the present study was to explore the association between respiratory frequency and HRV in a sample of participants with severe psychiatric illness and a non-psychiatric control group.
Science & Research
Quantitative results derived from the questionnaires were validated by qualitative data collected from a follow-up interview with a sample of participants.
Science
The purpose of this study, conducted in Atlanta, USA, was to use qualitative methodology to assess the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) in the context of smoking behavior in a sample of participants with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.
Science
In a randomized trial, virtual humans used one of three voice types (classic and modern text-to-speech engines, as well as human voice) to present information to a sample of participants from an online population.
Science
Data were obtained from a sample of participants with a known history of PVD who have had a previous vascular intervention and who are established patients in a vascular surgeon's private office N = 50.
Science
Initially, we sought a sample of participants who studied English Language Teaching at Vali-e-asr UnivexperienceRafsanjan and had experience of teaching English.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing your research methodology, clearly define how you obtained "a sample of participants" to ensure transparency and replicability.
Common error
Avoid simply stating that you used "a sample of participants" without detailing the specific sampling method (e.g., random, stratified, convenience). Providing these details is crucial for assessing the validity and generalizability of your findings.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a sample of participants" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig's examples illustrate its use in describing research methodologies and study populations.
Frequent in
Science
71%
Academia
25%
News & Media
2%
Less common in
Formal & Business
1%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "a sample of participants" is a grammatically sound and frequently used noun phrase that identifies a subset of individuals selected for a study. Ludwig's analysis confirms that the phrase is primarily used in scientific and academic contexts to describe research methodologies and study populations. Common alternatives include "a group of subjects" and "a selection of individuals". As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable in written English, particularly in formal settings. When using this phrase, ensure to specify the sampling method to maintain clarity and transparency in your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a group of subjects
Replaces "sample" with "group" and "participants" with "subjects", implying a more general collection of individuals.
a selection of individuals
Uses "selection" instead of "sample" and "individuals" instead of "participants", suggesting a deliberate choice of people.
a subset of people
Replaces "sample" with "subset" and "participants" with "people", indicating a smaller group taken from a larger population.
a cohort of participants
Uses "cohort" instead of "sample", implying a group sharing a common characteristic or experience.
a segment of the study population
Rephrases the concept to highlight the population being studied, emphasizing the representative nature of the sample.
a portion of the test subjects
Emphasizes the experimental context, replacing "participants" with "test subjects".
a cross-section of participants
Highlights the diversity within the sample, implying a representation of various subgroups.
a representative group of individuals
Focuses on the representativeness of the group, suggesting it accurately reflects the larger population.
a pool of research participants
Emphasizes the availability of participants for research purposes.
a set of subjects
Uses "set" as a more general term for a collection, and "subjects" instead of "participants".
FAQs
How do you use "a sample of participants" in a research context?
In research, "a sample of participants" refers to a subset of a larger population that is studied to draw inferences about the entire population. For example, "We recruited "a sample of participants" aged 18-25 to investigate the effects of social media on mental health."
What are some alternatives to "a sample of participants"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "a group of subjects", "a selection of individuals", or "a subset of people".
What is the importance of a representative "sample of participants"?
A representative "sample of participants" is crucial for ensuring that the results of a study can be generalized to the larger population from which the sample was drawn. Without a representative sample, the findings may be biased and not accurately reflect the population's characteristics.
How does the size of "a sample of participants" affect a study?
The size of "a sample of participants" can significantly impact the statistical power of a study. A larger sample size generally increases the likelihood of detecting a statistically significant effect, while a smaller sample size may lead to a failure to detect a real effect, also known as a Type II error.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested