Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a provided for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a provided for" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete or incorrect construction and does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The resources are a provided for aspect of the project." (This sentence is awkward and unclear.)
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
PO-A provided guidance for the study.
Science
There is often a list provided for you.
Wiki
A central category was provided for a neutral response.
Science
A function is called an antiderivative of provided for all.
A library is provided for access methods.
Science
a Examples are provided for cholesterol testers.
Science
A space is provided for other comments.
A recommendation is provided for each intervention.
Science
Although an International District is provided for, it has no chapters.
Wiki
A cloth bag is provided for storage.
News & Media
The settlement on Aug. 14 provided for a $400 million valuation.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "a provided for". Instead, opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "a provision for", "a resource for", or rephrase the sentence for clarity.
Common error
Do not use "a provided for" when you intend to create a noun phrase indicating a resource or arrangement. This phrasing is incorrect. Use "a provision for" or rephrase to ensure grammatical accuracy.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a provided for" is grammatically incorrect and does not function as a standard grammatical unit in English. It's often an incomplete attempt to form a noun phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "a provided for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI points out, it's not a recognized construction and often leads to awkward or unclear sentences. Instead, aim for alternatives like "a provision for", "a resource for", or restructure the sentence to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. While the intention might be to indicate something supplied or arranged, using the correct phrasing is crucial for effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a provision for
Replaces "provided for" with "provision", creating a noun phrase indicating something supplied or arranged.
a facility for
Suggests a resource or capability is made available for a specific purpose.
an allowance for
Implies a permitted deviation or tolerance within certain parameters.
a resource for
Highlights the availability of specific resources for a given purpose or need.
a service for
Focuses on the availability of services designed to meet specific requirements.
an arrangement for
Emphasizes that plans or preparations have been established for something.
a system for
Indicates the existence of a structured method or process in place.
a framework for
Suggests an underlying structure or set of principles that supports something.
support for
Expresses backing, assistance, or resources available to aid something or someone.
funding for
Specifies that financial resources are allocated or available for a specific cause or project.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "provided for" in a sentence?
"Provided for" typically follows a subject. For example: "The contract provided for annual increases". It's incorrect to use "a provided for" as a noun phrase.
What can I use instead of the incorrect phrase "a provided for"?
Better alternatives include "a provision for", "a resource for", or rephrasing the sentence entirely to express the intended meaning clearly.
Is "provided for" the same as "provision for"?
No, "provided for" is a verb phrase indicating an action taken (e.g., 'The law provided for the creation of a committee'), while "provision for" is a noun phrase that refers to a preparation or arrangement made in advance (e.g., 'There is a provision for unforeseen expenses').
How do I rephrase a sentence using "a provided for" to make it grammatically correct?
Instead of "a provided for," use "a provision for." For example, instead of "The budget includes a provided for contingency fund," say "The budget includes a provision for a contingency fund."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested