a paragon of explicitness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a paragon of explicitness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that exemplifies clarity and precision in communication or expression. Example: "The report was a paragon of explicitness, leaving no room for misunderstanding."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The region was a paragon of cruelty.

The Economist

A paragon of loyalty and strength.

The New York Times

You might think Arthur would be a paragon of deportment.

The New York Times - Books

But gold has not been a paragon of stable value.

The New York Times

Apple has not been a paragon of corporate governance.

The New York Times

He is hailed as a paragon of timeless male beauty.

The New York Times

And the opposition is hardly a paragon of virtue.

The Economist

On paper Brazil's prisons are a paragon of modernity.

The Economist

By this logic, Obama was a paragon of Christian piety.

The New York Times

"She's not a paragon of journalism," he added.

The New York Times - Sports

"I am a paragon of stability," he said.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "a paragon of explicitness" when you want to highlight something as a perfect example of clear and direct communication, leaving no room for ambiguity or misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "a paragon of explicitness" in casual or informal settings. Its formal tone can sound stilted or overly academic in everyday conversation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a paragon of explicitness" functions as a noun phrase, specifically an appositive or predicate nominative. It serves to rename or describe another noun, indicating that something embodies the highest level of clear and direct communication. Ludwig indicates its usability in written English, although examples are lacking.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a paragon of explicitness" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe something that serves as an ideal example of clarity and directness. While Ludwig confirms its usability, the lack of real-world examples suggests it may not be a frequently used expression. Alternatives such as "a model of clarity" or "an epitome of precision" might be more common. It is best suited for formal contexts where emphasizing a very high standard of unambiguous communication is desired.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a model of clarity

Focuses on the ease of understanding and absence of ambiguity.

an epitome of precision

Highlights the accuracy and exactness in expression.

a perfect example of clarity

Emphasizes the flawless nature of the clarity.

a textbook case of directness

Suggests the directness is so clear it could be used for teaching.

the embodiment of unambiguousness

Highlights the lack of any possible misinterpretation.

the quintessence of plainness

Focuses on the simplicity and lack of ornamentation in the expression.

a shining instance of lucidity

Emphasizes the clear and easily understood nature of the explicitness.

a prime illustration of frankness

Highlights the honesty and openness in the expression.

an ideal representation of straightforwardness

Focuses on the uncomplicated and easy-to-follow nature of the explicitness.

a classic demonstration of explicitness

Highlights how typical that explicitness is in a more traditional way.

FAQs

How can I use "a paragon of explicitness" in a sentence?

You can use "a paragon of explicitness" to describe something that perfectly exemplifies clarity and directness in communication or expression. For example, "The report was "a paragon of explicitness", leaving no room for misunderstanding."

What are some alternatives to "a paragon of explicitness"?

Alternatives include "a model of clarity", "an epitome of precision", or "a perfect example of clarity", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "a paragon of explicitness" or "very explicit"?

"A paragon of explicitness" implies that something is not only very explicit but also serves as an ideal example of explicitness. "Very explicit" is a more general description, while "a paragon of explicitness" suggests a higher standard and serves as an exemplar.

What does it mean to describe something as "a paragon of explicitness"?

Describing something as "a paragon of explicitness" means it's the highest standard or a perfect example of being clear, direct, and leaving no room for ambiguity. It sets a benchmark for how clear and direct something is presented.