a palpable inconsistency

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a palpable inconsistency" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a noticeable or easily perceived contradiction in a statement, argument, or situation. Example: "The report presented a palpable inconsistency between the data collected and the conclusions drawn by the researchers."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

A palpable hit.

Independent

A palpable chance!

The Guardian - Sport

A hit — a palpable hit!

The New York Times

It exudes a palpable impatience.

The New York Times - Food

Al Qaeda was a palpable danger.

The New York Times

There was a palpable atmosphere".

Independent

A hit, a palpable hit!

The Guardian - Sport

There is a palpable mass in half of cases.

La Revue de Médecine Interne

There was a palpable sense of betrayal.

The New Yorker

She communicates a palpable, deep-seated generosity.

The New Yorker

A palpable sense of melancholy pervades Iraq.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing formally, ensure the context supports the slightly heightened tone of "palpable". In more casual contexts, consider plainer alternatives like "obvious contradiction".

Common error

Avoid using "a palpable inconsistency" in very casual or informal writing, as "palpable" can sound overly formal or pretentious in everyday conversation. Simpler terms are often more effective.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a palpable inconsistency" functions as a noun phrase, where "palpable" modifies the noun "inconsistency". It describes a specific type of inconsistency that is easily perceived or felt. Based on Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a palpable inconsistency" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe a contradiction that is easily perceived. While Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, it's relatively rare. The phrase is best used in neutral to formal contexts where the goal is to emphasize that a discrepancy is not only present but also readily apparent. Consider alternatives like "obvious contradiction" or "clear discrepancy" for different shades of meaning or in more informal settings. Given the absence of examples, its usage patterns remain speculative across various contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

an obvious contradiction

Emphasizes the clarity and ease of perceiving the contradiction.

a clear discrepancy

Highlights the difference or divergence between two facts or statements.

a noticeable incongruity

Focuses on the lack of harmony or compatibility.

a marked disparity

Stresses the significant difference between comparable things.

a blatant contradiction

Indicates that the contradiction is very obvious and intentional.

a tangible conflict

Highlights the real and perceptible struggle or opposition.

a demonstrable variance

Focuses on a provable or measurable difference.

an evident divergence

Emphasizes the point at which things start to separate or differ.

a sharp contrast

Highlights a striking difference between two things.

a distinct contradiction

Underscores the clarity and unambiguity of the contradictory elements.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "a palpable inconsistency" in a sentence?

Use "a palpable inconsistency" when you want to highlight a contradiction that is not only present but also easily perceived or felt. For example, "There was "a palpable inconsistency" between his words and his actions".

What are some alternative ways to express "a palpable inconsistency"?

You can use alternatives like "an obvious contradiction", "a clear discrepancy", or "a noticeable incongruity" to convey a similar meaning. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to emphasize.

Is there a difference between "a palpable inconsistency" and "a logical inconsistency"?

"A palpable inconsistency" emphasizes that the contradiction is easily perceived, while "a logical inconsistency" focuses on the contradiction in reasoning or argumentation. The first is about the ease of noticing, the second about the nature of the error.

When is it appropriate to use "a palpable inconsistency" in writing?

It's appropriate in situations where you want to add emphasis to a contradiction, suggesting it's not just present but also very noticeable or even tangible. This phrase works well in analytical or critical writing.