Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a money of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a money of" is not correct and not usable in written English.
It does not convey a clear meaning and is not a standard expression in English. Example: "He found a money of coins in the old chest."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Encyclopedias
News & Media
Alternative expressions(8)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
No lira coins were struck during the Middle Ages, and the lira remained strictly a money of account.
Encyclopedias
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
Money Out of a Pipeline.
News & Media
Not just money — a lot of money.
News & Media
What a waste of money".
News & Media
It is not a grant of money.
News & Media
They need a lot of money".
News & Media
"But it's a lot of money.
News & Media
I make a lot of money.
News & Media
It's all a matter of money".
News & Media
Will he cost a lot of money?
News & Media
It was a question of money.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "a money of" in your writing, as it is not grammatically correct and can sound awkward. Opt for more standard expressions like "a sum of money" or "an amount of money".
Common error
The phrase "a money of" often results from incorrectly using the preposition 'of' with 'money'. Instead of trying to fit 'of' into the phrase, revise the sentence to use more appropriate wording, such as "a sum of money" or "financial resources".
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a money of" is primarily used as part of a longer phrase intended to specify the denomination, kind or measure related to money. However, Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not correct and not usable in written English.
Frequent in
Encyclopedias
50%
News & Media
50%
Science
0%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "a money of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use in standard English. As Ludwig AI explains, it's best to use alternative expressions like "a sum of money" or "an amount of money" to clearly and correctly convey the intended meaning related to financial matters. While some instances appear in sources like Encyclopedia Britannica and news articles, these do not validate the correctness of the construction itself.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a sum of money
Replaces the less common construction with a standard expression for an unspecified amount of money.
an amount of money
Similar to "a sum of money", this alternative emphasizes a specific quantity of money.
a financial resource
Replaces 'money' with a more formal term, emphasizing the financial aspect.
a source of income
Shifts the focus from the money itself to where the money is coming from.
a monetary fund
Suggests a pool of money set aside for a specific purpose.
a cash reserve
Implies money that is saved and readily available.
a means of payment
Focuses on the function of money as a way to pay for goods or services.
a form of currency
Broadens the expression to include different types of money.
a denomination of currency
Replaces the more vague term with emphasis on the specific unit value of the currency.
a matter of finance
Shifts the expression away from a specific amount of money, instead focusing on financial considerations.
FAQs
What is the correct way to refer to an unspecified amount of money?
Instead of the ungrammatical "a money of", use phrases like "a sum of money" or "an amount of money".
What can I say instead of "a money of" to refer to financial resources?
Consider using terms like "financial resources", "monetary funds", or "capital".
Is "a money of" grammatically correct?
No, "a money of" is not grammatically correct. Standard English usage dictates alternative phrasing for expressing monetary quantities or financial resources.
How can I rephrase a sentence that includes "a money of" to make it sound more natural?
Review the context of the sentence. If you're referring to an unspecified quantity, use "a sum of money". If you're referring to the financial aspects, use "a matter of finance" or "financial implications".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested