a minimum of three medals

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a minimum of three medals" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when specifying a required or expected quantity of medals in a context such as competitions or awards. Example: "To qualify for the championship, each athlete must earn a minimum of three medals in their respective events."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Funding body UK Sport says Team GB should win a minimum of three medals.

BBC

Funding body UK Sport expects a minimum of three medals of any colour after investing £13.45m but believes the squad to be capable of winning up to seven medals at February's Games.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Our aim is to win a minimum of four medals, of which at least one should be gold.

The Guardian - Sport

Men's head coach Jurgen Grobler is looking for "a minimum of two medals - but it could be five based on potential", while Thompson has set the same minimum target for the women.

BBC

They start in Barcelona on Sunday and UK Sport has set a minimum target of three medals as the team begins rebuilding after the 2012 Olympics.

BBC

Take a minimum of three days here.

The Guardian - Travel

Leaf throws a minimum of three interceptions.

The New York Times - Sports

There will be a minimum of three minutes.

The Guardian - Sport

"Let me say it was a minimum of three.

The Guardian - Music

There should be a minimum of three.

Forbes

"I need a minimum of three strikers.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When setting expectations or targets, clearly state "a minimum of three medals" to avoid ambiguity about the lower limit.

Common error

Ensure you're using "a minimum of three medals" when you intend to specify the least acceptable number, not the most. To define the upper limit you could use something like "a maximum of three medals".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a minimum of three medals" functions as a quantifier specifying a lower limit for the number of medals. Ludwig AI identifies this phrase as grammatically correct and usable. It is used to establish a baseline expectation or requirement.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Wiki

30%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Science

7%

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a minimum of three medals" is grammatically correct and commonly used to specify a lower limit or target for the number of medals in various contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. Common alternatives include "at least three medals" and "no fewer than three medals". While suitable for neutral communication, it's important to differentiate between 'minimum' and 'maximum' quantities to avoid confusion. Usage analysis reveals frequent occurrence in News & Media, Wiki, and academic settings, indicating its broad applicability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

at least three medals

Emphasizes the lower boundary of the quantity.

no fewer than three medals

Highlights that the quantity must be three or more.

three or more medals

States the quantity as a range.

at a minimum, three medals

Changes the sentence structure for emphasis.

three medals, if not more

Suggests the possibility of exceeding the stated quantity.

a baseline of three medals

Implies a starting point or expectation of three medals.

a target of at least three medals

Focuses on the goal or objective.

three medals as a starting point

Indicates the quantity as an initial aim.

not less than three medals

Uses a more formal tone to specify the lower limit.

a guarantee of three medals

Suggests a secured number of medals

FAQs

How can I use "a minimum of three medals" in a sentence?

You can use "a minimum of three medals" to indicate the lowest acceptable quantity of medals. For example, "The team needs "a minimum of three medals" to qualify for the next round."

What can I say instead of "a minimum of three medals"?

You can use alternatives like "at least three medals", "no fewer than three medals", or "three or more medals" depending on the context. For instance, "They must win "at least three medals"."

Which is correct, "a minimum of three medals" or "at minimum three medals"?

"A minimum of three medals" is the grammatically correct and more commonly used phrase. "At minimum three medals" is less standard.

What's the difference between "a minimum of three medals" and "exactly three medals"?

"A minimum of three medals" means three or more medals are required or expected, while "exactly three medals" means only three medals, no more and no less.