a minimum amount of capital

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a minimum amount of capital" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in financial contexts to refer to the least quantity of capital required for a specific purpose, such as starting a business or making an investment. Example: "To launch the new project, we need to secure a minimum amount of capital to cover initial expenses."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

It is far better to require all banks to hold a minimum amount of capital that has been specifically earmarked for bail-in.

The New York Times

Our last analysis on this matter, the % of startups that have raised more than $30m (our proxy for a minimum amount of capital raised for a large-ish exit – more details towards the end) lends further support to this.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Regulators therefore have proposed a secondary measure to force a bank to carry a set minimum amount of capital relative to its total assets, regardless of the risk those assets might pose.

Huffington Post

The BOI assesses the solvency of a bank by the adequacy of its core capital the minimum amount of capital a bank is required to hold to support its lending.

The Economist

In addition, one of the main ways that a financial institution can reduce its minimum amount of capital is to reduce its risk weighted assets.

SERIEs

The minimum amount of capital banks must hold as a cushion against possible collapse is rising from 2% to 7%, although bank analysts in the City noted that all UK banks – and many elsewhere in the world – already passed this threshold.

The Guardian - Business

The regulator said the minimum amount of capital that banks would be required to hold would be higher than last year, but it had yet to come up with an actual definition of that measure, known as core Tier 1 capital.

The New York Times

Since 1988 a committee of central bankers and supervisors meeting in Basel has negotiated international rules for the minimum amount of capital banks must hold relative to their assets.

The Economist

Last Tuesday in Washington, the Federal Reserve Board, the F.D.I.C and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency proposed doubling the minimum amount of capital that the eight largest United States banks would be required to maintain.

The New York Times

Earlier in the day, Mr. Osborne challenged his fellow European finance ministers to carry out the international accord, known as Basel III, raising the minimum amount of capital that banks are required to hold.

The New York Times

"We're not implementing the Basel agreement, as anyone who takes a look at this text will be able to tell you — every bank analyst, every financial journalist, every other finance ministry in the world would say that," said Mr. Osborne, referring to Basel III, the accord to raise the minimum amount of capital that banks are required to hold.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Be precise in quantifying the “minimum amount”. Whenever possible, specify the exact figure or the method used to calculate it to ensure clarity and avoid misunderstandings.

Common error

Avoid using "a minimum amount of capital" when you actually mean an adequate or sufficient amount. The term "minimum" implies the absolute lowest acceptable level, whereas "adequate" suggests enough to meet specific needs or goals. Use "sufficient capital" or "adequate funding" if the intention is to convey more than just the bare minimum.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a minimum amount of capital" functions as a noun phrase, specifically serving to quantify the smallest acceptable level of financial resources. Examples in Ludwig illustrate its use in contexts requiring specific financial thresholds.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a minimum amount of capital" is a noun phrase used to specify the smallest acceptable level of financial resources. As Ludwig AI pointed out, the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for professional contexts, notably finance and business. It’s important to use this phrase precisely, ensuring that it reflects the lowest acceptable level, rather than an adequate level. Related phrases, such as "minimum capital requirement" or "minimal financial resources", offer alternative ways to express the concept, with slight differences in emphasis. While the usage is not extremely common, being found in News & Media and Scientific publication, understanding its proper application is essential for effective communication in financial and business settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

minimum capital requirement

Focuses on the regulatory or mandatory aspect of the minimum capital needed.

least amount of funds

Replaces "capital" with "funds", making it slightly less formal.

minimal financial resources

Substitutes "capital" with "financial resources", broadening the scope to include various forms of assets.

basic capital level

Highlights the fundamental nature of the capital amount.

initial capital outlay

Emphasizes the starting investment required.

minimum equity investment

Specifically refers to the equity portion of the capital.

required capital threshold

Stresses the idea of a boundary or limit for capital.

essential capital base

Highlights the foundational nature of the capital.

the bare minimum investment

Emphasizes the absolute lowest level of investment.

a low level of funding

Uses the term "funding" and describes it as "low" instead of "minimum".

FAQs

How to use "a minimum amount of capital" in a sentence?

You can use "a minimum amount of capital" to describe the smallest sum of money needed for an investment or business venture. For example, "To start this business, we need "a minimum amount of capital" of $10,000."

What can I say instead of "a minimum amount of capital"?

Alternatives include "minimum capital requirement", "least amount of funds", or "minimal financial resources". The best choice depends on the context.

Which is correct, "a minimum amount of capital" or "minimum capital"?

"A minimum amount of capital" and "minimum capital" can both be correct, but they have slightly different uses. "A minimum amount of capital" is more common when specifying a quantity, while "minimum capital" can refer to a general concept or requirement.

What's the difference between "a minimum amount of capital" and "sufficient capital"?

"A minimum amount of capital" refers to the absolute lowest level of capital required, while "sufficient capital" implies enough capital to meet specific needs or goals. "Sufficient capital" may be more than the bare minimum.