a joint stipulation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a joint stipulation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to refer to an agreement made by two or more parties regarding a particular issue in a case. Example: "The parties submitted a joint stipulation to the court, outlining their agreement on the facts of the case."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The state and the foundation filed a joint stipulation for dismissal of the lawsuit on Tuesday.

The New York Times

On June 26 , 2007the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the litigation, and on that same day, the court entered an order dismissing the case".

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

The joint stipulation of dismissal, which prohibits the A.C.L.U. from raising the claims again or appealing the judge's ruling, effectively ends the case.

The New York Times

Later in the day, however, Deen's attorneys filed another motion withdrawing their earlier request to have Billips removed as Jackson's lawyer "pursuant to the Parties' joint stipulation and their Agreed Order of Dismissal with Prejudice".

Huffington Post

It is a joint search.

The Economist

"It was a joint idea.

The New York Times

"Lincoln" is a joint triumph.

The New Yorker

It was a joint result.

The New York Times - Science

A joint was passed.

The New York Times - Magazine

"I loved a joint.

BBC

Rolling a joint.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In legal documents, use "a joint stipulation" to formally record agreements reached between opposing sides, ensuring clarity and enforceability.

Common error

Do not use "a joint stipulation" when only one party is setting the terms; it implies mutual agreement and can be misleading if used otherwise.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a joint stipulation" functions as a noun phrase, typically used in legal contexts. It refers to a formal agreement or arrangement that is agreed upon by two or more parties. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase indicates a shared understanding or consensus.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a joint stipulation" is a noun phrase primarily used in legal settings to denote a formal agreement reached between two or more parties. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and typical application in legal contexts. While relatively rare in general usage, it plays a crucial role in documenting shared understandings and facilitating legal processes. Alternative phrases, such as "mutual agreement" or "agreed statement", can be used depending on the specific nuance required. When employing this phrase, clarity and mutual consent are paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

joint agreement

Uses a more direct synonym for "stipulation".

mutually agreed terms

Emphasizes the agreed-upon conditions.

mutual agreement

Replaces "stipulation" with a more general term for agreement.

jointly determined conditions

Similar to mutually agreed terms, but emphasizes the determination process.

agreed statement

Focuses on the agreement being documented as a statement.

coordinated resolution

Highlights the coordinated aspect of resolving an issue.

consensual arrangement

Emphasizes the consent and arrangement aspect.

collaborative settlement

Highlights the collaborative nature and settlement context.

shared understanding

Focuses on the mutual understanding achieved.

collective decision

Highlights the decision-making process being collective.

FAQs

How is "a joint stipulation" typically used in legal proceedings?

In legal proceedings, "a joint stipulation" is used to present an agreement reached by all parties involved, streamlining the process by establishing agreed-upon facts or conditions.

What is the difference between "a joint stipulation" and a unilateral agreement?

While "a joint stipulation" involves agreement from all parties, a unilateral agreement is made by one party alone, without requiring the consent of others. They are fundamentally different in terms of consent and obligation.

When might parties choose to file "a joint stipulation"?

Parties might choose to file "a joint stipulation" when they've reached a consensus on specific aspects of a case, like extending deadlines or admitting certain evidence, to expedite the legal process.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "a joint stipulation" in legal writing?

Alternatives include phrases such as "mutual agreement", "agreed statement", or "consensual arrangement", which may be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.