a joint consequence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a joint consequence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an outcome that results from the combined actions or effects of multiple parties or factors. Example: "The environmental damage was a joint consequence of industrial pollution and deforestation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The surprising result described above is a joint consequence of both a high rate of price rise for carbon fluxes, and a low discount rate for them.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Previous empirical data suggest that genes exhibiting plasticity to environmental context also exhibit greater genetic variation within populations, as a joint consequence of both mutational and selective pressure.

Genome Biology and Evolution

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The difference in choice behavior between the two groups of participants is the joint consequence of the effect of gloating on risk aversion and the difference in the amount of gloating experienced by the participants.

Plosone

For it is locality that enables one to overcome the incompatibility of position and momentum measurements of Albert's system by requiring their joint consequences for Niels' system to be incorporated in a single, stable reality there.

SEP

(ii) Illiquidity, i.e., the joint consequences of limited funding and price impact, decreases market stability.

Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk

Illiquidity, i.e., the joint consequences of limited funding and price impact, decreases market stability.

Probability, Uncertainty and Quantitative Risk

With parliamentary elections coming up in the United Kingdom, France and Germany in the coming weeks, it's not likely that G-7 leaders will agree to a joint statement of any consequence at the conclusion of their meeting Saturday.

Huffington Post

In mechanically loaded parts, like in the subchondral bone of a loaded joint, the remodelling might lead to a weakening of the bone and, in consequence, to a joint collapse [ 14, 5, 6].

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

If the osteonecrosis occurs in mechanically loaded parts, like in the subchondral bone of a loaded joint, the remodelling might lead to a weakening of the bone and, in consequence to a joint collapse.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Toward that end, the Corporation supported soon-to-be-renowned economists Emile Benoit and Kenneth Boulding to conduct a joint study on the economic consequences of disarmament, bringing together researchers from academic institutions, the private sector, and government.

Huffington Post

According to a BBC report, North Korea's foreign ministry went as far threatening "grave consequences" and demanding a joint investigation into the allegations.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "a joint consequence" to clearly indicate that an outcome is the result of multiple contributing factors, ensuring that the reader understands the complexity of the cause-and-effect relationship.

Common error

Avoid using "a joint consequence" when a single cause is predominantly responsible for the outcome; instead, use phrases that highlight the primary factor. Misusing the phrase can obscure the true nature of the relationship and mislead the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a joint consequence" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as a subject complement or an appositive. It identifies an outcome resulting from the combined effect of multiple factors, as demonstrated in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a joint consequence" is a phrase used to describe an outcome that results from the combination of multiple factors. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct. The phrase appears most frequently in scientific and news contexts, suggesting a formal or neutral register. When using "a joint consequence", ensure it accurately reflects the multifaceted nature of the cause-and-effect relationship. Alternative phrases, such as "a shared outcome" or "a combined effect", can offer subtle variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a shared outcome

Focuses on the shared nature of the result rather than the combination of factors.

a combined effect

Highlights the merging of effects, instead of the outcome.

a mutual result

Emphasizes reciprocity in the outcome, which might not always be present in the original phrase.

a collective repercussion

Implies a more significant and widespread impact than the original phrase.

a consolidated ramification

Suggests a more formal or structured aggregation of effects.

an associated development

Indicates a linked progression or unfolding of events.

a correlated result

Focuses on the statistical relationship between factors and the outcome.

a synergistic effect

Implies that the combined effect is greater than the sum of individual effects.

a unified consequence

Emphasizes the uniformity and coherence of the outcome.

an intertwined result

Focuses on the complex interconnectedness of the factors leading to the result.

FAQs

How can I use "a joint consequence" in a sentence?

Use "a joint consequence" to describe situations where multiple factors contribute to a single outcome. For example, "The economic downturn was "a joint consequence" of rising interest rates and decreased consumer spending."

What phrases are similar to "a joint consequence"?

Similar phrases include "a shared outcome", "a combined effect", or "a mutual result". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "joint consequence" or "combined consequence"?

"Joint consequence" and "combined consequence" are similar, but "joint" often implies a more collaborative or interconnected set of causes, whereas "combined" simply suggests that multiple factors are at play.

When is it inappropriate to use the phrase "a joint consequence"?

Avoid using "a joint consequence" if the outcome is clearly attributable to a single, dominant cause. In such cases, a phrase emphasizing direct causation would be more accurate.