Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

a husk of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a husk of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is empty or devoid of substance, often referring to a remnant or shell of something that once had more value or significance. Example: "After the storm, the once vibrant town was left as a husk of its former self, with abandoned buildings and empty streets."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

I'm just a husk of a man.

News & Media

The Guardian

A husk of a country, duly prepared for Western domination.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Also in 2015, Trump was compared to a husk of corn, a caterpillar and a doughnut.

News & Media

The Guardian

Flies were doing their primitive dance above a husk of coconut.

News & Media

The New York Times

The key figure is Shawn's Dick, a husk of an actor.

News & Media

The Guardian

I kept walking, the volcanic rock like a husk of dead earth beneath my running shoes.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

I've pitted Omar against everything from a kebab shop to a sad husk of a human being.

News & Media

Vice

It was a simple husk of a building housing a noisy press.

His monotone delivery and 1,000-yard 1,000-yardjustareght for the role of Will, arerey husk of a man, blasted by a breakdown and living out of the back of a van.

I was a broken husk of a space cadet.

Are we now a desolate husk of a country, sucked dry by Eduardo Saverin's rapine?

News & Media

The Economist
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a husk of", ensure the context clearly establishes what the original, fuller version was. This provides a stronger contrast and emphasizes the degree of loss or reduction.

Common error

Avoid using "a husk of" in everyday situations where the reduction isn't significant. Overusing it can make your writing sound melodramatic or insincere; reserve it for situations with genuine loss or decline.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a husk of" functions as a modifier, typically used to describe a noun that has been significantly reduced or depleted. It suggests that the noun is now a mere shell or remnant of its former self, as illustrated in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Science

11%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a husk of" effectively describes something that has been drastically reduced to a mere remnant of its former state. As Ludwig AI highlights, the phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used, particularly in news and media contexts. While versatile, it's best reserved for scenarios where a genuine sense of loss or decline is intended, preventing overuse and maintaining its impact. Consider alternatives such as ""a shell of"" or ""a remnant of"" to fine-tune your message.

FAQs

How can I use "a husk of" in a sentence?

Use "a husk of" to describe something that has been reduced to a mere shell or remnant of its former self. For example, "After the economic collapse, the city became "a husk of" its former glory".

What are some alternatives to saying "a husk of"?

You can use alternatives like "a remnant of", "a shell of", or "a shadow of" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "the husk of" instead of "a husk of"?

While "a husk of" generally refers to something reduced to a shell-like state, "the husk of" usually refers to the outer covering of a seed or fruit. Using "the husk of" to describe a general decline is less common and may not always be appropriate.

What does it mean when something is described as "a husk of a man"?

Describing someone as "a husk of a man" implies they have been diminished, either physically, emotionally, or spiritually, and are no longer the person they once were.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: