a good quality indicator

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a good quality indicator" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing metrics or measures that effectively reflect the quality of a product, service, or process. Example: "Customer satisfaction surveys serve as a good quality indicator for our service performance."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Wiki

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Colour is often considered a good quality indicator, and the expression of exaggerated colours may depend on individual condition during moult.

Plosone

Total number of colposcopies for CIN2+ detected in screened women is now considered a good quality indicator of overdiagnosis [ 30].

BMC Cancer

These studies suggested that the adherence to a practice guideline could be a good quality indicator of smoking cessation training programs.

BMC Public Health

All of these tests have been proven to be a good quality indicator of your fitness level.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Despite that more than half of the drug use prevention projects have reached a good quality index, the absent indicators of shortcomings must be included in them or in new projects.

Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica

We observed a weak correlation between the SI and the visits EI, indicating that centres with good quality indicators do not necessarily achieve them by increasing the number of visits.

BMC Health Services Research

Secondaries: the only one in the area, McLaren high, has mostly "good" quality indicators.

The Guardian - Money

The use of PCV combined with adequate median PEEP of 15 mbar seems to be an indicator for a good quality of care during IHT.

Annals of Intensive Care

The achievement of these goals is perceived to be an indicator of a good quality of care.

Cardiovascular Diabetology

A previous study [13] indicates that a silhouette coefficient is a good cluster quality indicator, suggesting that this metric leads to a good F1 value if a good answer is obtained for any given search.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

All these indicators suggest that the data collected for this paper has a good quality.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "a good quality indicator", ensure the context clearly defines what aspect of quality is being indicated and why the chosen indicator is reliable. This provides clarity and strengthens the argument.

Common error

Avoid relying solely on one "good quality indicator" without considering other factors. Quality is often multifaceted, and a single indicator may not provide a complete or accurate assessment. Always corroborate with additional data points.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a good quality indicator" functions as a noun phrase. It identifies a specific metric or measure that serves to evaluate the quality of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase follows standard grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

Wiki

25%

News & Media

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a good quality indicator" serves to highlight a specific and effective metric for assessing quality. As affirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically sound and can be used across multiple contexts, although it appears more frequently in scientific or technical fields. When employing this phrase, clarity and context are crucial, to ensure the chosen indicator is appropriately defined and its reliability is well understood. Remember to avoid overreliance on single indicators, as quality often encompasses numerous factors. While the phrase is not overwhelmingly common, its directness and precision make it a valuable tool in professional and academic discussions about quality assurance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reliable quality gauge

Replaces "indicator" with "gauge", emphasizing the measurement aspect of quality.

dependable quality metric

Substitutes "indicator" with "metric", which is more quantitative and formal; "good" is replaced with "dependable".

solid quality benchmark

Replaces "indicator" with "benchmark", suggesting a standard for comparison; "good" is replaced with "solid".

trustworthy quality signal

Substitutes "indicator" with "signal", implying a sign or cue of quality; "good" is replaced with "trustworthy".

credible quality marker

Replaces "indicator" with "marker", suggesting something that designates quality; "good" is replaced with "credible".

valid quality index

Substitutes "indicator" with "index", which is a more structured and often numerical measure; "good" is replaced with "valid".

reputable quality criterion

Replaces "indicator" with "criterion", implying a standard against which quality is judged; "good" is replaced with "reputable".

effective quality proxy

Substitutes "indicator" with "proxy", meaning it represents quality indirectly; "good" is replaced with "effective".

sound quality measure

Replaces "indicator" with "measure", focusing on the quantifiable aspect of quality; "good" is replaced with "sound".

excellent quality predictor

Substitutes "indicator" with "predictor", suggesting it forecasts quality; "good" is replaced with "excellent".

FAQs

How can I use "a good quality indicator" in a sentence?

You can use "a good quality indicator" to describe metrics or measures that effectively reflect the quality of a product, service, or process. For example: "Customer satisfaction surveys serve as "a good quality indicator" for our service performance."

What are some alternatives to "a good quality indicator"?

Some alternatives to "a good quality indicator" include "reliable quality measure", "effective quality gauge", or "dependable quality metric". The best choice depends on the specific context.

What makes something "a good quality indicator"?

A "good quality indicator" should be reliable, valid, and relevant. It should accurately reflect the aspect of quality being measured, provide consistent results, and be directly related to the desired outcome.

Is it always sufficient to rely on "a good quality indicator" to assess quality?

While a "good quality indicator" can provide valuable insights, it's often insufficient to rely on it alone. Quality is usually multifaceted, and it's best to use a combination of indicators and qualitative assessments for a comprehensive evaluation.