a glaring disproportion

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a glaring disproportion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a noticeable and significant imbalance or inequality in a particular context, such as statistics, resources, or representation. Example: "The report highlighted a glaring disproportion in the funding allocated to different departments, raising concerns about fairness."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

In a document outlining the investigation, the prosecutor's office said that it was looking into claims that "there is a glaring disproportion between the earnings of the owner and the amount the municipal government is losing or failing to earn".

The Guardian - Sport

Through 153 games, the Mets have not hit a grand slam, but they have given up 12, to become the only team to have such a glaring disproportion of grand slams in a season.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Large American families consume resources and produce waste in glaring disproportion to most other families of the world.

The New York Times

It is a glaring omission.

The New York Times

But the revisions have a glaring omission.

The New York Times

This is a glaring omission.

The New York Times

Again, a glaring double standard.

The Guardian - Opinion

The organization locked itself into a glaring asymmetry.

The New Yorker

(A glaring one: "The Signal and the Noise" by Nate Silver).

The New York Times - Books

Not to do so was craven, a glaring omission.

The New York Times

What a glaring disconnect.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a glaring disproportion", ensure that the context clearly establishes what two or more things are being compared and why their imbalance is significant. Providing specific data or examples can strengthen your argument and improve clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "a glaring disproportion" when simply referring to a large amount or quantity of something without a comparative element. "Disproportion" implies an imbalance between entities, not just a large value in isolation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a glaring disproportion" functions as a noun phrase that typically serves as a subject, object, or complement within a sentence. Ludwig shows this phrase is employed to identify a significant and readily apparent imbalance or inequality, as confirmed by the examples.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a glaring disproportion" is a noun phrase used to emphasize a significant and easily noticeable imbalance between two or more entities. As shown by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and is found across various contexts like news, media, and scientific publications. While not very common, its use is appropriate when a striking imbalance needs to be highlighted. Consider alternatives like ""a striking imbalance"" or ""a conspicuous disparity"" based on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a striking imbalance

Replaces "disproportion" with "imbalance" and "glaring" with "striking", focusing on the noticeable difference.

a conspicuous disparity

Substitutes "disproportion" with "disparity" and "glaring" with "conspicuous", highlighting the obvious contrast.

a marked inequality

Replaces "disproportion" with "inequality" and "glaring" with "marked", emphasizing the unfairness of the difference.

a noticeable asymmetry

Changes "disproportion" to "asymmetry" and "glaring" to "noticeable", focusing on the lack of balance.

a pronounced difference

Replaces the original phrase to point out how different the compared entities are.

a clear imbalance

Focuses on the clarity of the imbalance, rather than the degree or the perception.

a significant difference

Highlights that the difference observed is of great importance.

an obvious discrepancy

Switches the word choice to focus on difference not following the correct guidelines, making it obvious.

a major variation

Highlights the presence of a huge variation between two or more entities.

a gross deviation

Highlights the fact that an entity is largely deviated from the guidelines.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "a glaring disproportion" in a sentence?

To effectively use "a glaring disproportion", ensure you're comparing two or more distinct entities and highlighting a significant imbalance between them. For example: "There is "a glaring disproportion" between the resources allocated to urban versus rural schools."

What are some alternatives to "a glaring disproportion" that I can use?

Depending on the specific nuance you want to convey, you can use alternatives such as "a striking imbalance", "a conspicuous disparity", or "a marked inequality".

Is it more appropriate to say "glaring disproportion" or "obvious disproportion"?

"Glaring disproportion" and "obvious disproportion" are quite similar, but "glaring" suggests a more striking and easily noticeable imbalance. The choice depends on the degree of emphasis you want to convey. You could also consider "significant difference".

How does "a glaring disproportion" differ from a simple "disproportion"?

Adding "glaring" emphasizes the obviousness and severity of the disproportion. While "disproportion" simply indicates an imbalance, ""a glaring disproportion"" draws attention to how pronounced and easily noticeable that imbalance is.