a former review

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a former review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a review that was conducted or published in the past. Example: "In light of the recent changes, we should revisit a former review to assess its relevance."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

The law review is "fairly disconnected from the breadth and the rough and tumble of real politics," said Bruce Spiva, a former review editor who now practices civil rights law in Washington.

The New York Times

A former review 14 reached similar conclusions, but included randomised controlled trials and observational studies in their overall analysis.

BMJ Open

As a result, our study is in line with findings from a former review [ 32] and long-standing clinical experience.

Alzheimer's Research and Therapy

For a more comprehensive account of these signals in relation to the clinic, we refer the reader to a former review (Dreier, 2011).

Brain

A former review summarizes that the major role for PPARs is in the trans-suppression of inflammatory gene activation by negatively interfering with the nuclear factor κB (NF- κB) [ 115].

BioMed Research International

This 87.6% rate of mammographically detected DCIS is slightly higher than the mean 81.5% rate of infraclinical lesions found in a former review of 909 patients treated for DCIS in Bordeaux) (Barreau et al, 2005).

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

The former review by a Novartis Corp. group defined four tracks of cancer targets: genetics, synergy, lineage and host.

British Journal of Cancer

A former narrative review on impulsivity in BD (Najt et al. 2007) suggested that there were both state and trait components to impulsivity.

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

In a former systematic review, 11 studies reported more short implant failures before loading, while 7 studies reported more implant failures after loading [39].

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Journalism specialists and former Review editors criticized the Dow Jones decision.

The New York Times

We follow the procedure applied in former review of reviews [ 32, 33].

BMC Health Services Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a former review", ensure the context clearly indicates what the review is former to, such as a current policy, understanding, or situation. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming "former" always implies obsolescence. While it indicates something from the past, the information in "a former review" might still be relevant or informative, even if not currently active or applicable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a former review" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as a subject, object, or complement within a sentence. It identifies a review that occurred in the past. Ludwig shows various examples of its use in academic and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a former review" is a noun phrase used to reference an evaluation or assessment conducted in the past. As Ludwig AI suggests, it's grammatically correct and appears in a variety of contexts, notably in scientific and news-related articles. The phrase carries a neutral tone and is helpful for providing historical context or comparing past findings with present situations. Remember to ensure clarity by specifying what the review is former to, and be mindful that "former" doesn't always equate to "obsolete". Alternatives such as ""a previous review"" or ""an earlier review"" can be used to add variety to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a previous review

Replaces "former" with "previous", indicating something that came before; maintains similar meaning and formality.

an earlier review

Substitutes "former" with "earlier", suggesting a review that took place at an earlier time; slightly less formal.

a past review

Uses "past" instead of "former", emphasizing that the review is no longer current; maintains a similar level of formality.

a prior review

Replaces "former" with "prior", indicating a review that preceded the current one; slightly more formal.

a one-time review

Emphasizes that the review happened only once in the past; adds a sense of finality.

a review from the past

Rephrases the concept to highlight that the review belongs to the past; slightly more descriptive.

a bygone review

Utilizes "bygone" to indicate a review that is long past or outdated; adds a slightly archaic tone.

a retrospective review

Specifies that the review looked back on past events or performance; more specific in meaning.

the initial review

Highlights that the review was the first in a series or process; focuses on the starting point.

a superseded review

Indicates the review has been replaced or made obsolete by a newer one; implies obsolescence.

FAQs

How can I use "a former review" in a sentence?

You can use "a former review" to refer to a review that happened in the past. For example, "The current policy is based on findings from "a former review" conducted in 2018".

What are some alternatives to saying "a former review"?

Alternatives include "a previous review", "an earlier review", or "a past review", depending on the context and desired level of formality.

Is it always necessary to specify the date of "a former review"?

While not always necessary, specifying the date or context of "a former review" can enhance clarity and relevance, especially if multiple reviews exist.

What's the difference between "a former review" and "a current review"?

"A former review" refers to a review that has been conducted in the past, while "a current review" refers to one that is presently underway or recently completed. The key difference lies in the timeframe.