a double implication

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a double implication" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to discuss a situation or statement that has two meanings or interpretations that imply each other. Example: "The politician's statement had a double implication, suggesting both support for the policy and a critique of its execution."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In the presence of Commutation, a double implication pair collapses into single implication →.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In fact, molecular classification of cancer is a specific classification problem, as it incorporates essential double implications: classification and identifying biomarkers of cancer.

BMC Medical Genomics

A double.

The New Yorker

The double had a double.

Independent

A double suicide?

The New York Times - Books

A double bluff?

Independent

*For a double, naturally.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Want a double espresso?

The New York Times

— experienced a double murder.

The New York Times

Make mine a double.

Independent

I do a double take.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "a double implication" when you want to convey that a statement or action carries two distinct but interconnected meanings or consequences. Ensure the context makes both implications clear to the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "a double implication" when the context is already convoluted. Clarity is paramount; if the double implication is too subtle or requires extensive explanation, consider simplifying the wording for better understanding.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a double implication" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes a situation or statement that carries two distinct but related meanings or consequences. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through its examples.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a double implication" is a noun phrase used to describe a situation or statement that carries two distinct but related meanings. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its grammatical correctness. While relatively rare, the phrase appears in diverse contexts, including science, news, and general writing, suggesting a neutral to formal register. To enhance clarity, consider alternatives like "a dual meaning" or "a twofold implication" if the context requires more precision. When using "a double implication", ensure both meanings are clear and avoid overcomplicating already complex scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a dual meaning

This alternative emphasizes the presence of two distinct meanings within a single statement or situation.

a twofold implication

This phrase highlights that there are two aspects to the implication being made.

a two-way implication

Focuses on the reciprocal nature of the implication, suggesting a mutual relationship.

a reciprocal implication

Similar to "a two-way implication", this emphasizes the mutual dependence between two concepts.

a mutual implication

This highlights that the implication is shared or held in common between two entities or ideas.

a shared implication

Similar to "a mutual implication", this emphasizes that the implication is jointly understood or experienced.

a complex implication

This suggests that the implication is not straightforward and involves multiple layers or interpretations.

a layered implication

Similar to "a complex implication", highlighting the presence of multiple levels of meaning.

a dualistic implication

This emphasizes the presence of two opposing or contrasting implications.

a two-pronged implication

This phrase suggests the implication has two distinct and separate parts or aspects.

FAQs

How can I use "a double implication" in a sentence?

You can use "a double implication" to describe a situation or statement that carries two distinct but related meanings. For instance, "The new policy has "a double implication": it both encourages innovation and risks increased competition".

What are some alternatives to saying "a double implication"?

Alternatives include "a dual meaning", "a twofold implication", or "a two-way implication", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "a double implication" or "a dual implication"?

Both phrases are valid, but "a dual implication" might be preferred for clarity, especially in technical contexts. "A double implication" can sometimes be ambiguous, whereas "dual" clearly indicates two distinct aspects.

What's the difference between "a double implication" and "a double standard"?

"A double implication" refers to a situation with two intertwined meanings or consequences, while "a double standard" refers to applying different rules or expectations to different groups or individuals.