a cost for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a cost for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the amount of money associated with a purchase, service, or other transaction. For example, "The final cost for the repairs came to $500."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It's a cost for start-ups.

The New York Times

It has a cost for everybody.

The Guardian

"Once you add a cost for wiring, modules immediately appear.

Cornell University

"There was a cost for creating that perception".

The New York Times

Now, is there going to be a cost for this?

The New Yorker

But such profits carry a cost for consumers.

The New York Times

There is a cost for James in all of this.

The New York Times - Sports

But that comes at a cost for the winner.

The Economist

The logo map carries a cost for mainlanders, too.

The Guardian

Quanterix has yet to establish a cost for the test.

MIT Technology Review

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

However, this value will be referred here as A-cost for consistency.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a cost for", ensure the context clearly identifies who or what bears the expense or consequence. For example, "There is a cost for businesses that fail to innovate".

Common error

Avoid using "a cost for" when referring to non-quantifiable consequences. For intangible effects, consider phrases like "implications of" or "consequences of" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a cost for" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating that someone or something bears a burden, expense, or negative consequence. As Ludwig AI explains, it refers to the amount of money associated with a purchase, service, or other transaction. The examples from Ludwig show it used in various contexts, from business to personal decisions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

32%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a cost for" is a versatile way to express that something has a consequence, often negative, associated with it. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness in written English and its utility in referring to expenses or consequences tied to transactions. As demonstrated by Ludwig's numerous examples, it appears most frequently in news and media, followed by scientific and academic contexts. When using "a cost for", be sure the context makes clear what that cost is and to whom or what it applies. Alternatives like "implications of" or "price associated with" can offer subtle variations in meaning, depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

price associated with

Emphasizes the direct financial value linked to something.

expense related to

Highlights the financial outlay connected to a particular item or action.

implications for

Focuses on the broader consequences or effects rather than just the monetary aspect.

financial burden of

Specifically emphasizes the financial strain or difficulty.

monetary value of

Highlights the financial or economic worth.

trade-offs involved in

Highlights the balancing act of advantages and disadvantages.

ramifications for

Emphasizes the often complex and far-reaching consequences.

drawbacks of

Shifts the focus to the negative aspects or disadvantages.

disadvantages of

Similar to 'drawbacks of', this emphasizes negative aspects or inconveniences.

detrimental effects on

Focuses on the harmful or damaging outcomes.

FAQs

How can I use "a cost for" in a sentence?

Use "a cost for" to indicate that something has a consequence or expense associated with it. For example, "There's "a cost for every decision"".

What's an alternative to "a cost for" that emphasizes a financial burden?

If you want to emphasize the financial strain, consider using "financial burden of" as a substitute.

What's the difference between "a cost for" and "implications of"?

"A cost for" usually refers to a direct expense or disadvantage, while "implications of" refers to broader, often less tangible, consequences.

When is it better to use "consequences of" instead of "a cost for"?

Use "consequences of" when discussing the results or outcomes of an action, especially if those outcomes are not easily quantifiable in monetary terms. "A cost for" is best when the impact is directly measurable or felt as an expense.