Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a controversial alignment
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a controversial alignment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or agreement that is subject to disagreement or debate among different parties. Example: "The proposed policy represents a controversial alignment between environmental concerns and economic growth."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
It was a controversial alignment at the time, with many speaking out against befriending a former "enemy".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
The band alignment at the Cu2ZnSn(solar4/cellsolar cell heterojunction is a controversial issue, as different measurements and calculations point to substantially different conduction band offsets (CBO).
Fees are a controversial issue.
News & Media
This is a controversial subject.
News & Media
She was a controversial figure.
News & Media
"This is a controversial nominee.
News & Media
"This is a controversial story.
News & Media
This is a controversial idea.
News & Media
This is a controversial issue.
News & Media
Baraka was a controversial figure.
News & Media
A controversial choice, perhaps.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "a controversial alignment", ensure the context clearly identifies the specific parties or elements that are being aligned and why the alignment is considered controversial. Providing details on the differing viewpoints or potential conflicts can strengthen your argument.
Common error
Avoid using "a controversial alignment" without specifying the nature of the controversy. Failing to provide context can make the statement vague and uninformative, leaving the reader unsure of the specific issues at stake.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a controversial alignment" functions as a noun phrase, where "controversial" modifies the noun "alignment". Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically sound and used to describe a debated connection or association. The example provided shows its use in describing formal ties between cities.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "a controversial alignment" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe a situation or agreement marked by significant disagreement or debate. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is valid and usable in written English. While relatively rare, it appears in contexts such as news, science, and business. To ensure clarity, it's best to provide specific details about the nature of the controversy and the parties involved. Alternatives like "a contentious agreement" or "a disputed arrangement" can offer similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a contentious agreement
Replaces "controversial alignment" with a direct synonym for an agreement causing dispute.
a disputed arrangement
Focuses on the disagreement surrounding the arrangement, highlighting the contested nature.
a divisive alliance
Emphasizes the polarizing effect of the alliance, suggesting it creates factions.
a problematic partnership
Highlights the issues and difficulties associated with the partnership.
a questionable union
Suggests doubts and uncertainty about the validity or benefits of the union.
a debated coalition
Focuses on the ongoing discussions and arguments surrounding the coalition.
an uneasy truce
Highlights the instability and potential for conflict within the agreement.
a shaky compromise
Emphasizes the fragility and potential for collapse of the compromise.
a contested strategy
Highlights the disagreement surrounding the chosen strategic approach.
a fraught consensus
Emphasizes the difficulty and tension involved in reaching the consensus.
FAQs
What does "a controversial alignment" mean?
The phrase "a controversial alignment" refers to a situation where different entities, ideas, or groups are brought together in a way that sparks significant disagreement or debate. The controversy usually stems from conflicting interests, values, or potential outcomes of the alignment.
How can I use "a controversial alignment" in a sentence?
You can use "a controversial alignment" to describe situations where there is significant disagreement about a particular partnership, strategy, or union. For instance, "The new policy represents "a controversial alignment" between environmental protection and economic development."
What are some alternatives to "a controversial alignment"?
Alternatives include phrases like "a contentious agreement", "a disputed arrangement", or "a divisive alliance", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
In what contexts is "a controversial alignment" typically used?
The phrase "a controversial alignment" is often used in political, business, or scientific contexts to describe situations where different interests or ideologies are brought together in a way that causes debate or disagreement.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested