a consequence of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a consequence of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the result or effect of an action or event. For example: "The drought was a consequence of human-caused deforestation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"Making together a consequence of America".

The New York Times - Books

Beriberi is a consequence of thiamine deficiency.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was a consequence of Republican intransigence.

The New Yorker

"Yes, that is a consequence of travelling.

The Guardian - Film

Is it a consequence of it?

The Guardian - Tech

"My lifestyle is a consequence of my wounds.

The Guardian

It is not a consequence of bad institutions or policies.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Sex is a consequence of my interest in women's looks.

The Guardian

Eventually, consciousness is a consequence of these neural mappings.

The New York Times - Books

The first was a consequence of fluid passing and movement.

The Guardian - Sport

Nor was her defenestration a consequence of Democratic intransigence.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "a consequence of" to clearly establish a cause-and-effect relationship in your writing. Ensure that the connection between the cause and consequence is evident to the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "a consequence of" when describing a correlation rather than a direct causal relationship. Ensure the stated cause demonstrably leads to the stated effect; otherwise, rephrase to indicate a correlation or association.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a consequence of" functions as a causal connector, linking an action, event, or condition to its result or outcome. It explicitly establishes a cause-and-effect relationship, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

29%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a consequence of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used causal connector that effectively establishes cause-and-effect relationships. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It appears most commonly in news and media, scientific writing, and encyclopedic contexts. While versatile, ensure a clear causal link to avoid misinterpretations. Consider alternatives like "resulting from" or "due to" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a result of

Indicates a direct outcome.

due to

More direct and commonly used in explanations.

because of

Similar to 'due to' but slightly more informal.

resulting from

Highlights the outcome or effect.

attributable to

Implies assigning responsibility or causation.

following from

Suggests a logical or sequential connection.

stemming from

Focuses on the origin or cause of something.

a product of

Emphasizes the creation or development of something.

arising out of

Suggests a less direct or immediate cause.

in the wake of

Often used for events with broad or significant effects.

FAQs

How can I use "a consequence of" in a sentence?

"A consequence of" introduces the result of a particular action or situation. For example, "The increase in pollution is "a consequence of" rapid industrialization".

What are some alternatives to saying "a consequence of"?

You can use phrases like "resulting from", "due to", or "because of" to convey a similar meaning, depending on the context.

Is it more formal to use "a consequence of" than "because of"?

While both phrases indicate causality, ""a consequence of"" is generally considered more formal than "because of", making it suitable for academic or professional writing.

What's the difference between "a cause of" and "a consequence of"?

"A cause of" refers to the origin or reason for something, while ""a consequence of"" refers to the result or effect. They are opposite sides of a causal relationship.