a case against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a case against" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or argumentative contexts to refer to evidence or reasons that support a position opposing someone or something. Example: "The prosecutor presented a compelling case against the defendant, highlighting the evidence collected during the investigation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Macedonia has a case against Greece.

The Economist

Stephen Burt makes a case against author photos.

The New Yorker

Apple recently settled a case against Nokia.

The Guardian - Tech

Lacayo's is a case against change.

The Guardian - Opinion

Can I make a case against a spammer?

Cornell University

HOW many states brought a case against Google?

The New York Times

It's hard to see a case against transparency.

The New York Times

It's difficult to make a case against that.

Independent

There will be a case against me, not him.

The New York Times

| Many paths remain for a case against SAC.

The New York Times

Partly because there is a case against electoral reform too.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a case against", ensure the evidence or reasoning supporting your argument is clear and compelling. Strong cases rely on specific examples and logical connections.

Common error

Avoid using "a case against" when the evidence is weak or circumstantial. Overstating your argument can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a case against" primarily functions as a noun phrase that introduces or summarizes arguments, evidence, or reasons opposing a particular subject. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's often used in legal or argumentative contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Academia

29%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a case against" is a versatile phrase used to introduce opposition or disagreement, particularly when presenting evidence or logical arguments. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and frequent usage in legal and argumentative scenarios. While adaptable to various contexts, it's most commonly found in news media and academic writing. When using this phrase, ensure your arguments are well-supported and clearly articulated. Alternatives include "an argument against" or "reasons to oppose", which can be substituted depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

an argument against

Focuses specifically on the logical or persuasive elements of the opposition.

reasons to oppose

Highlights the rationale and justification for taking an opposing stance.

grounds for objection

Emphasizes the legal or formal basis for disagreeing or challenging something.

evidence of wrongdoing

Specifically points to proof or indications of misconduct or illegal activity.

criticism of

Highlights a negative evaluation or expression of disapproval.

opposition to

Denotes a direct and often active resistance or antagonism.

disapproval of

Expresses a feeling of not approving something or someone

challenging the validity of

Focuses on questioning or disputing the correctness or legitimacy of something.

contesting the claims of

Indicates a disagreement with specific assertions or statements made by someone.

presenting a counter-argument

Highlights the action of offering an opposing viewpoint with supporting evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "a case against" in a sentence?

You can use "a case against" to introduce arguments or evidence that oppose a particular idea, person, or thing. For example, "The lawyer presented "a case against" the defendant."

What can I say instead of "a case against"?

You can use alternatives like "an argument against", "reasons to oppose", or "grounds for objection" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct: "a case against" or "a case for"?

Both "a case against" and "a case for" are correct, but they have opposite meanings. "A case against" presents reasons for opposing something, while "a case for" presents reasons for supporting it.

What's the difference between "a case against" and "criticism of"?

"A case against" typically implies a structured presentation of evidence and arguments, often in a legal or formal context. "Criticism of" is a more general term that refers to any expression of disapproval or negative evaluation.