a bunch of slackers

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a bunch of slackers" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a group of people who are perceived as lazy or unmotivated, often in a casual or informal context. Example: "The project was delayed because the team was just a bunch of slackers who didn't take their responsibilities seriously."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

We thought Gen X was a bunch of slackers.

The Washington Post

"They decry their next elders as the most selfish and complaining generation and the least heroic, and a bunch of slackers".

The New York Times - Style

Or, are you secretly thinking there are a bunch of slackers out there in the world?

Forbes

"Bernie has refused to see the nation's youth as a bunch of slackers" (aaaaand @Manda_like_wine & I taking notes) pic.twitter.com/y07CuCqoyk.

Huffington Post

In fact, you can find more television reporters at the NYSE than traders these days -- which may be why there has been so much coverage of this "movement," which based on the absurd statements coming from some of its participants has no real meaning other than to give a bunch of slackers something to do with their lives.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Of course, a commercial this offensive (Coca-Cola seems to be implying that we're all a bunch of lazy slackers with our posteriors glued to any chair in the vicinity) was bound to trigger our imaginations.

Huffington Post

It is impossible to overstate the level of devotion tween, teen and fully adult fans feel for this show and the novel series upon which it is based On social media, they make "Scandal's" gladiators look like a bunch of ambivalent slackers.

Los Angeles Times

To the Editor: Far from being a resource-consuming bunch of slackers, members of the baby boom generation have worked hard and steadily for 40 years to pay the bills for themselves, their children and, yes, their parents in the Greatest Generation, an admirable group that nevertheless has taken much more money out of our social safety net than it ever put in.

The New York Times

It's that the bunch of slackers that claimed to be working from home without actually doing any work ruined it for everyone.

TechCrunch

A bunch of ventriloquists?

The New York Times

"A bunch of racists".

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a bunch of slackers", consider the audience and context, as it can be perceived as harsh. Opt for it in informal settings or when aiming for a comedic effect.

Common error

Avoid using "a bunch of slackers" in professional emails or formal reports. It's too casual and can undermine your credibility. Use more neutral language like "underperforming team" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a bunch of slackers" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject complement or object, offering a negative characterization of a group. Ludwig AI shows the phrase is used in contexts where a collective is being criticized for lack of effort or productivity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a bunch of slackers" is a noun phrase used to describe a group of people perceived as lazy or unproductive. According to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct but primarily suited for informal contexts. Its communicative purpose is often to express disapproval or criticism. While the phrase is commonly found in news and media, its use in formal or professional settings is discouraged. Consider using more neutral alternatives like "underperforming team" or "inefficient workers" for professional communication. Remember that choosing the right words can impact the clarity and tone of your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

group of idlers

Replaces "slackers" with "idlers", emphasizing inactivity and avoidance of work.

collection of loafers

Substitutes "slackers" with "loafers", highlighting laziness and wasting time.

crowd of lazybones

Uses "lazybones" instead of "slackers", a more informal and playful term for someone lazy.

team of underachievers

Replaces "slackers" with "underachievers", focusing on the failure to meet expectations.

set of good-for-nothings

Uses "good-for-nothings" instead of "slackers", a stronger and more derogatory term for useless individuals.

gang of layabouts

Replaces "slackers" with "layabouts", a British English term for idle and lazy people.

cohort of shirker

Replaces "slackers" with "shirker", focusing on the individuals who avoid work or duty.

assemblage of indolent people

Uses "indolent people" to replace "slackers", giving a more formal and clinical tone.

division of non-workers

Replaces "slackers" with "non-workers", directly highlighting their lack of productivity.

organization of inactive individuals

Replaces "a bunch of slackers" with this phrase to add formality, but at the cost of impact and clarity.

FAQs

How can I use "a bunch of slackers" in a sentence?

You can use "a bunch of slackers" to describe a group of people who are lazy or unproductive. For example, "The project failed because it was handled by "a bunch of slackers" who didn't meet their deadlines".

What's a less harsh way to say "a bunch of slackers"?

Instead of "a bunch of slackers", consider using phrases like "underperforming team", "unmotivated group", or "inefficient workers" depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "a bunch of slackers" in a professional setting?

Generally, no. "A bunch of slackers" is informal and can be seen as disrespectful. It's better to use more professional terms like "low productivity" or "lack of engagement" in professional contexts.

What's the difference between "a bunch of slackers" and "underachievers"?

"A bunch of slackers" emphasizes laziness and lack of effort, while "underachievers" focuses on the failure to reach their potential or expected level of performance. They both describe negative attributes, but the focus is slightly different.