a blind man

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a blind man" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a male individual who is visually impaired. Example: "The story revolves around a blind man who navigates the challenges of life with remarkable resilience."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

We befriend a blind man.

The New Yorker

How does a blind man fight?

The New Yorker

A blind man takes a walk.

The New Yorker

I'm like a blind man.

The Guardian - Music

"A blind man can see that.

The New York Times - Sports

Even a blind man could catch them.

The New York Times - Sports

Tells about a blind man who walks past his house.

The New Yorker

In a bookshop, he is akin to a blind man.

The Guardian

A blind man hunts for crystals in the rock.

The Guardian - Books

9am: A blind man interviews a deaf man.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

"That's what you call a blind-man hit," Sheffield said.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about individuals with blindness, prioritize person-first language (e.g., "a man who is blind" instead of "a blind man") to emphasize their humanity and individuality.

Common error

Be mindful of using "a blind man" as a derogatory term or in contexts that perpetuate negative stereotypes. Focus on respectful and accurate representation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a blind man" functions primarily as a noun phrase, acting as a subject or object within a sentence. Ludwig examples show it used in both literal and figurative contexts. This is in line with Ludwig AI's assessment of the phrase as usable and correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a blind man" is grammatically correct and commonly used to refer to a male individual who is visually impaired. While acceptable, it's important to consider the context and choose language that is respectful and avoids perpetuating negative stereotypes. Person-first language, such as "a man who is blind", is often preferred. As supported by Ludwig, this phrase is used in various contexts, ranging from news and media to academic and scientific discussions, and can also be used metaphorically. Choosing the right words ensures clarity and sensitivity in communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a visually impaired man

Replaces "blind" with a more clinical and potentially less stigmatizing term.

a sightless man

Uses a more poetic and formal term for lacking sight.

a man without sight

Emphasizes the absence of sight as a defining characteristic.

a man who is blind

A more descriptive and direct way of stating the condition.

a man living with blindness

Focuses on the experience of living with the condition, rather than just the condition itself.

a man lacking vision

Similar to 'without sight' but uses a slightly different word choice.

a man unable to see

States the inability to see directly.

someone who is blind

Shifts the focus from 'man' to 'someone', making it more inclusive.

a person with blindness

Uses 'person' for greater inclusivity and focuses on the condition.

metaphorically blind

Indicates a figurative use of blindness, such as being unaware of something obvious.

FAQs

How can I use "a blind man" in a sentence?

You can use "a blind man" to refer to a male individual who is visually impaired. For example: "The story is about "a blind man" who overcomes adversity with courage."

What's a more respectful alternative to "a blind man"?

Consider using "a visually impaired man" or "a man who is blind" to emphasize the person rather than the disability.

Is it offensive to use the term "a blind man"?

While not inherently offensive, it's often preferred to use person-first language such as "a man with blindness" to avoid defining someone solely by their condition.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "a blind man"?

It's generally appropriate when providing a factual description, but always consider the context and whether person-first language would be more respectful. For instance, instead of "a blind man crossing the street", you could say "a man who is blind crossing the street".